模拟PEM燃料电池环境下质子交换膜损伤研究

doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-0220

太阳能学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 493-498.DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-0220

模拟PEM燃料电池环境下质子交换膜损伤研究

杨卫战, 谈金祝, 刘嘉然, 夏威, 王燕康

南京工业大学机械与动力工程学院,南京 211816

收稿日期:2021-03-03 出版日期:2022-09-28 发布日期:2023-03-28
通讯作者: 谈金祝（1964—）,男,博士、教授、博士生导师,主要从事新能源技术及装备方面的研究。tjznjut@njtech.edu.cn

STUDY ON DEGRADATION OF PROTON EXCHANGE MEMBRANE IN SIMULATED PEM FUEL CELL ENVIRONMENTS

Yang Weizhan, Tan Jinzhu, Liu Jiaran, Xia Wei, Wang Yankang

College of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China

Received:2021-03-03 Online:2022-09-28 Published:2023-03-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 该文研究在模拟燃料电池环境下的质子交换膜（PEM）材料的损伤情况。选用2种溶液模拟质子交换膜燃料电池（PEMFC）环境,一种是接近燃料电池实际运行环境溶液,称为正规溶液（RS）,另一种则为加速试样老化的加速持久性（ADT）溶液。采用衰减全反射傅里叶变换红外光谱（ATR-FTIR）和X射线光电子能谱（XPS）技术对老化试样表面的化学成分变化进行研究;同时,采用机械拉伸性能试验对老化前后试样进行研究。试验结果表明,在模拟PEMFC环境下,随着老化时间的增加,试样表面分子结构和化学成分发生明显变化,抗拉强度和断裂伸长率降低,试样材料损伤加剧。

关键词: 质子交换膜燃料电池, 质子交换膜, 老化, 损伤

Abstract: In this work, in order to investigate the material degradation of PEM, the PEM was exposed to the simulated PEMFC environments. In order to simulate PEMFC environments, two solutions were selected. One of the solutions was called as the regular solution（RS）, close to the real PEM fuel cell environment,and another solution was an accelerated durability test（ADT）solution for the accelerated aging tests. Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy （ATR-FTIR） and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy （XPS） were used to study the surface chemistry change of aging samples. The mechanical properties tests were conducted for the samples before and after aging. The experimental results show that with the increase of aging time, the molecular structure and chemical composition of the sample surface change significantly, the tensile strength and elongation at break decreased, and the degradation of the sample material increased.

Key words: proton exchange membrane fuel cells, proton exchange membrane, aging, degradation

中图分类号:

TM911.42

杨卫战, 谈金祝, 刘嘉然, 夏威, 王燕康. 模拟PEM燃料电池环境下质子交换膜损伤研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(9): 493-498.

Yang Weizhan, Tan Jinzhu, Liu Jiaran, Xia Wei, Wang Yankang. STUDY ON DEGRADATION OF PROTON EXCHANGE MEMBRANE IN SIMULATED PEM FUEL CELL ENVIRONMENTS[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43(9): 493-498.

参考文献

[1] 侯明, 衣宝廉. 燃料电池技术发展现状与展望[J]. 电化学, 2012, 18(1): 1-13.
HOU M, YI B L.Progress and perspective of fuel cell technology[J]. Journal of electrochemistry, 2012, 18(1):1-13.
[2] SHAN J, LIN R, XIA S X, et al.Local resolved investigation of PEMFC performance degradation mechanism during dynamic driving cycle[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2016, 41(7): 4239-4250.
[3] BORUP R, MEYERS J, PIVOVAR B, et al.Scientific aspects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability and degradation[J]. Chemical reviews, 2007, 107(10): 3904-3951.
[4] ZHAO J, LI X G.A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell durability for vehicular applications: Degradation modes and experimental techniques[J]. Energy conversion and management, 2019, 199: 112022-102043.
[5] SHI S W, DURSCH T J, BLAKE C, et al.Impact of hygrothermal aging on structure/function relationship of perfluorosulfonic-acid membrane[J]. Journal of polymer science part B: polymer physics, 2016, 54(5): 570-581.
[6] 朱京宇, 谈金祝, 潘清, 等. 镁离子对质子交换膜性能的影响[J]. 高分子材料科学与工程, 2020, 36(9): 144-149.
ZHU J Y, TAN J Z, PAN Q, et al.Effect of magnesium ions on performance of proton exchange[J]. Polymer materials science & engineering, 2020, 36(9): 144-149.
[7] KINUMOTO T, INABA M, NAKAYAMA Y, et al.Durability of perfluorinated ionomer membrane against hydrogen peroxide[J]. Journal of power sources, 2006, 158(2): 1222-1228.
[8] SINGH Y, WHITE R T, NAJM M, et al.Tracking the evolution of mechanical degradation in fuel cell membranes using 4D in situ visualization[J]. Journal of power sources, 2019, 412: 224-237.
[9] SUN X Y, SHI S W, FU Y J, et al.Embrittlement induced fracture behavior and mechanisms of perfluorosulfonic-acid membranes after chemical degradation[J]. Journal of power sources, 2020, 453:227893.
[10] LI G, TAN J Z, GONG J M.Degradation of the elastomeric gasket material in a simulated and four accelerated proton exchange membrane fuel cell environments[J]. Journal of power sources, 2012, 205: 244-251.
[11] 殷金鹏, 谈金祝, 张武建, 等. 模拟PEM燃料电池环境下垫片材料的机械性能研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2018, 39(3): 686-691.
YIN J P, TAN J Z, ZHANG W J, et al.Study on mechanical properties of the gasket material in simulated PEM fuel cell environments[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2018, 39(3): 686-691.
[12] WANG Z Q,TAN J Z,WANG Y K, et al.Chemical and mechanical degradation of silicone rubber under two compression loads in simulated proton-exchange membrane fuel-cell environments[J]. Journal of applied polymer science, 2019, 136(33): 47855.
[13] TAN J Z, CHAO Y J, YANG M, et al.Chemical and mechanical stability of a silicone gasket material exposed to PEM fuel cell environment[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2011, 36(2): 1846-1852.
[14] TAN J Z, CHAO Y J, LEE W K, et al.Degradation of gasket materials in a simulated fuel cell environment[C]//Proceedings of the ASME 2006 4th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology, California, USA, 2006:233-241.

[1]	石嫄嫄, 和庆冬, 吴衍剑, 杜君峰, 张敏. 基于多失效模式的海上浮式风电机组结构可靠性研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(9): 236-241.
[2]	石磊, 许思传, 刘泽. 基于人工神经网络的3 kW质子交换膜燃料电池电堆一致性优化[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(8): 498-503.
[3]	刘志恩, 罗玉兰, 周辉, 卢炽华, 杜常清. 燃料电池空气系统增湿器建模与仿真[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(8): 504-509.
[4]	廉钰弢, 郑明刚. PEMFC圆形双极板径向流场环形肋板孔道研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(7): 9-15.
[5]	刘译阳, 周小春. 物理法制备燃料电池用催化剂[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 295-305.
[6]	李珂, 张横, 郑晓宇, 陈乾定, 陈卓. 预磁极化条件下PEM水电解制氢特性与效率研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 321-326.
[7]	周京华, 孟祥飞, 陈亚爱, 张贵辰. 基于新能源发电的电解水制氢直流电源研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 389-397.
[8]	孙峰, 苏丹丹, 殷宇捷, 董小平, 李志远, 庞彬. PEMFC翅脉流道传质及输出性能分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 414-419.
[9]	马志侠, 张林鍹, 郑兴, 谢明浩, 杜甜甜. 基于PEMFC-P2G与风光不确定的综合能源系统优化调度[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 441-447.
[10]	王万腾, 李楠, 许宏鹏, 徐瑞阳, 张瑾辉. 基于鹦鹉螺仿生结构的流道对PEMFC性能提升研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 448-453.
[11]	王珂, 张拴羊, 徐洪涛, 刘舜, 毛逸君. 基于神经元的PEMFC仿生流道性能模拟研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 454-459.
[12]	赵杰, 李文浩, 杜常清, 卢炽华. 不同操作和环境条件下的PEMFC低温冷启动数值模拟研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 460-466.
[13]	徐广英, 梁思哲, 曾蓉. 质子交换膜燃料电池催化剂金属氧化物载体研究进展[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 467-475.
[14]	夏国栋, 张晓亚, 马丹丹, 丁荣扩. 质子交换膜燃料电池参数敏感性分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 493-499.
[15]	苏昕, 徐立军, 胡兵. 考虑多变量因素影响的光伏PEM制氢系统建模与分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 521-529.

模拟PEM燃料电池环境下质子交换膜损伤研究

STUDY ON DEGRADATION OF PROTON EXCHANGE MEMBRANE IN SIMULATED PEM FUEL CELL ENVIRONMENTS

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics