波浪作用引起的海洋结构物振动会以循环载荷的方式作用于海床,此类作用方式可导致海床内超静孔隙水压力上升有效应力下降,直至海床液化。为研究海洋结构物波致振动对多孔介质海床内超静孔隙水压力的演化规律,该文通过2台步进电机控制结构物模型运动的方法在水槽中进行试验研究,分别讨论了砂床特性、结构物自重、结构物振动的振幅和周期对海床内超静孔隙水压力的影响,给出了海床在结构物多变的加载振幅和周期作用下的液化特性。结果表明,颗粒直径越小的砂质海床,超静孔隙水压力的累积现象越明显;自重对超静孔隙水压力累积和瞬态变化影响显著;随波致振动的振幅增加或周期减小,超静孔隙水压力的累积及液化深度显著增加;海洋结构物底部海床靠近中部区域的超静孔隙水压力累积的幅值大于端部区域。
Abstract
The oscillation of the marine structure caused by the wave action could act on the seabed in the form of cyclic load, which results in the accumulation of the excess pore water pressure in the seabed, and the liquefaction of the seabed occasionally. In order to investigate the evolution of the excess pore water pressure in the porous seabed under the action of wave-induced oscillation of the marine structure, a two-dimensional flume experiment was carried out with marine structure movement controlled by two stepping motors. Experiments by using different sand beds, structure models with different the self-weights, and structure movement with different amplitude and periods were adopted. The liquefaction characteristics of the seabed through load amplitude and period was presented by using the excess pore water pressure, which indicated that the smaller the diameter of the sandy seabed, the more obvious the accumulation of excess pore water pressure, and the self-weight of the marine structure has a significant effect on the accumulation of excess pore water pressure. Moreover, the liquefaction depth increases with increase of the movement amplitude, and decreases with the increase of the movement period. Furthermore, the amplitude of the excess pore water pressure measured at the middle of the structure is greater than that at the end area.
关键词
海上风电 /
海洋结构物 /
液化 /
孔压力 /
波致振动 /
海床响应
Key words
offshore wind power /
liquefaction /
pore pressure /
wave-induced oscillation /
seabed response
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 柳国环, 练继建, 于通顺. 透射边界-地基-风电结构地震响应与破坏模式[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(9): 2651-2658.
LIU G H, LIAN J J, YU T S.Research on seismic response and failure modes of system of transmitting boundary-soil-wind power structures[J]. Rock and soil mechanics, 2014, 35(9): 2651-2658.
[2] ZEN K, YAMAZAKI H.Field observation and analysis of wave-induced liquefaction in seabed[J]. Soils and foundations, 1991, 31(4): 161-179.
[3] KUMAJAI T, FODA M A.Analytical model for response of seabed beneath composite breakwater to wave[J]. Journal of waterway, port, coastal and ocean engineering, 2002, 128(2): 62-71.
[4] BIOT M A.General theory of three-dimensional consolidation[J]. Journal of applied physics, 1941, 12(2): 155-164.
[5] DAMGAARD J S, SUMER B M, TEH T C, et al.Guidelines for pipeline on-bottom stability on liquefied noncohesive sea beds[J]. Journal of waterway, port, coastal, and ocean engineering, 2006, 132(4): 300-309.
[6] SUMER B M, TRUELSEN C, FRDSOE J.Liquefaction around pipelines under waves[J]. Journal of waterway, port, coastal, and ocean engineering, 2006, 132(4): 266-275.
[7] TEH T C, PALMER A C, DAMGAARD J S.Experimental study of marine pipelines on unstable and liquefied seabed[J]. Coastal engineering, 2003, 50(1): 1-17.
[8] OUMERACI H.Review and analysis of vertical breakwater failures—Lessons learned[J]. Coastal engineering, 1994, 22(1-2): 3-29.
[9] SILVESTER R, HSU J R C. Sines revisited[J]. Journal of waterway port coastal & ocean engineering, 1989, 115(3): 327-343.
[10] IAI S.A strain space multiple mechanism model for cyclic behavior of sand and its application[D]. Tokyo: University of Tokyo, 1991.
[11] KUDELLA M, OUMERACI H, DE G M B, et al. Large-scale experiments on pore pressure generation underneath a caisson breakwater[J]. Journal of waterway, port, coastal and ocean engineering, 2006, 132(4): 310-324.
[12] OKA F, YASHIMA A, MIURA K, et al.Settlement of breakwater on submarine soil due to wave-induced liquefaction[C]//Proceeding of the 5th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Hague, Netherlands, 1995, 1(9): 482-487.
[13] 何广讷. 重力式平台地基的模型律[J]. 大连工学院学报, 1985(4): 53-58.
HE G N.Model law of gravity platform foundation[J]. Journal of Dalian Institute of Technology, 1985(4): 53-58.
[14] 陈林雅, 郑东生, 王盼娣, 等. 基于波浪-多孔介质海床-结构物耦合模型的单桩基础波浪力分析[J]. 工程力学, 2019, 36(11): 72-82.
CHEN L Y, ZHENG D S, WANG P D, et al.Wave force analysis of single pile foundation based on wave-porous medium seabed-structure coupling model[J]. Engineering mechanics, 2019, 36(11): 72-82.
[15] 王立忠, 潘冬子, 潘存鸿, 等. 波浪对海床作用的试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2007, 40(9): 101-109.
WANG L Z, PAN D Z, PAN C H, et al.Experimental study on the effect of waves on the seabed[J]. China civil engineering journal, 2007, 40(9): 101-109.
[16] 钟佳玉, 郑永来, 倪寅. 波浪作用下砂质海床孔隙水压力的响应规律实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(10): 3188-3193.
ZHONG J Y, ZHENG Y L, NI Y.Experimental study on the response law of pore water pressure on sandy seabed under wave action[J]. Rock and soil mechanics, 2009, 30(10): 3188-3193.
[17] 王小雯, 张建民, 李焯芬. 波浪作用下饱和砂质海床土体与管线相互作用规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(7): 2499-2508,2554.
WANG X W, ZHANG J M, LI C F.Wave-induced interaction of saturated sandy seabed with pipeline[J]. Rock and soil mechanics, 2018, 39(7): 2499-2508,2554.
[18] 吴雷晔, 朱斌, 陈仁朋, 等. 波浪-海床-结构物相互作用离心模型试验及数值模拟[J]. 土木工程学报, 2019, 52(S2): 186-192.
WU L H, ZHU B, CHEN R P, et al.Centrifuge test and numerical simulation of wave-seabed-structure interaction[J]. China civil engineering journal, 2019, 52(S2): 186-192.
[19] SUMER B M, HATIPOGLU F, FREDSØE J, et al. The sequence of sediment behavior during wave-induced liquefaction[J]. Sedimentology, 2006, 53(3): 611-629.
[20] SUMER B M, FIGEN H, DIXEN, et al. Cover stones on liquefiable soil bed under waves[J]. Coastal engineering, 2010, 57(9): 864-873.
[21] JENG D S, SEYMOUR B, 高福平, 等. 波浪载荷下海床土体孔隙水压的瞬态与累积响应机理[J]. 中国科学(E辑:技术科学), 2007, 37(1): 91-98.
JENG D S, SEYMOUR B, GAO F P, et al.Transient and cumulative response mechanism of seabed soil pore water pressure under wave loading[J]. Science in China press, 2007, 37(1): 91-98.
[22] ZEN K, JENG D S, HSU J R C, et al. Wave-induced seabed instability: Difference between liquefaction and shear failure[J]. Soils & foundation, 1998, 38(2): 37-47.
基金
海南省自然科学基金(519MS024); 国家自然科学基金-青年基金(51609056)