根据地热利用系统回灌的要求,对热源在系统出口处的温度进行限制,研究了双压有机朗肯循环（DPORC）中的热量分配以及随运行时间的系统性能变化,针对5种不同的有机工质进行了计算分析。研究表明：系统热力学性能的最大值和有机工质流量的最小值在同样的k值（热源提供给高压循环的热量与热源为DPORC提供的热量比）处获得。而采用R600和R245fa系统的净输出功率较大;相比R601,采用R245fa可以将系统的净输出功率提高168.06 kW（5.55%）,热效率和效率分别可提高0.70%和2.86%。相比于单压有机朗肯循环（SPORC）,DPORC可以有效减小系统随运行时间净输出功率降低的幅度。经过40 a的运行,采用R601的系统净输出功率降低幅度最低（428.11 kW, 14.14%）,而采用R600系统的净输出功率降低幅度最大（526.75 kW, 16.55%）。
Abstract
According the requirement of system injection in geothermal utilization, the temperature of the heat source at the exit of the system is specified and 5 kinds of organic working medium with different critical temperatures are selected for thermodynamic calculation. The heat distribution and the performance of DPORC with running time were studied, and the results indicated that the maximum value of the thermodynamic parameters of the system and the minimum value of the flow of organic working medium were obtained at the same k （Ratio of heat provided by the heat source to the high-pressure cycle to heat provided by the heat source to DPORC） value. The net output power of system with R600 and R245fa as working fluid is larger. Compared with R601, the net output power of system with R245fa as fluid can increase by 168.06 kW （5.55%）, while thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency can increase by 0.70% and 2.86% respectively. Compared with single-pressure organic （SPORC）, DPORC can reduce the decrease of net output power with variable running time effectively. After 40 a of operation, R601 has the lowest net output power reduction （428.11 kW, 14.14%）, while R600 has the highest net output power reduction （526.75 kW, 16.55%）.
关键词
有机朗肯循环 /
地热能 /
热力学性能 /
高压循环热量占比 /
运行时间
Key words
organic Rankine cycle /
geothermal energy /
thermodynamic performance /
ratio of high-pressure cycle heat /
running time
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] LI J,GE Z,DUAN Y Y, et al.Design and performance analyses for a novel organic Rankine cycle with supercritical-subcritical heat absorption process coupling[J]. Applied energy, 2019, 235: 1400-1414.
[2] ANDERSON A,REZAIE B.Geothermal technology: trends and potential role in a sustainable future[J]. Applied energy, 2019, 248: 18-34.
[3] ZHANG L X, PANG M Y, HAN J, et al.Geothermal power in China: development and performance evaluation[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2019, 116: 109431.
[4] YANG F B, CHO H J, ZHANG H G, et al.Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for CNG engine waste heat recovery[J]. Applied energy, 2017, 205: 1100-1118.
[5] LUO X L, YI Z T, ZHANG B J, et al.Mathematical modelling and optimization of the liquid separation condenser used in organic Rankine cycle[J]. Applied energy, 2017, 185: 1309-1323.
[6] BRAIMAKIS K,KARELLAS S.Exergetic optimization of double stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)[J]. Energy, 2018, 149: 296-313.
[7] LECOMPTE S, HUISSEUNE H, BROEK M V D, et al. Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2015, 47: 448-461.
[8] LI J, GE Z, DUAN Y Y, et al.Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles[J]. Applied energy, 2018, 217: 409-421.
[9] WANG M T, CHEN Y G, LIU Q Y, et al.Thermodynamic and thermo-economic analysis of dual-pressure and single pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles[J]. Energy conversion management, 2018, 177: 718-736.
[10] ZHAI H X, AN Q S, SHI L, et al.Categorization and analysis of heat sources for organic Rankine cycle systems[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2016, 64: 790-805.
[11] MA Y Y, LI S B, ZHANG L G, et al.Numerical simulation study on the heat extraction performance of multi-well injection enhanced geothermal system[J]. Renewable energy, 2020, 151: 782-795.
[12] HU S Z, LI J, YANG F B, et al.Thermodynamic analysis of serial dual-pressure organic Rankine cycle under off-design conditions[J]. Energy conversion and management, 2020, 213: 112837.
[13] HU S Z, LI J, YANG F B, et al.How to design organic Rankine cycle system under fluctuating ambient temperature: a multi-objective approach[J]. Energy conversion and management, 2020, 224: 113331.
[14] ZENG Y C, TANG L S, WU N Y, et al.Numerical simulation of electricity generation potential from fractured granite reservoir using the MINC method at the Yangbajing geothermal field[J]. Geothermics, 2018, 75: 122-136.
[15] ZHANG C, JIANG G Z, JIA X F, et al.Parametric study of the production performance of an enhanced geothermal system: a case study at the Qiabuqia geothermal area, northeast Tibetan plateau[J]. Renewable energy, 2019, 132: 959-978.
[16] LI D T, HE Z L, WANG Q, et al.Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a partial evaporating dual-pressure organic rankine cycle system for low-grade heat recovery[J]. Applied thermal engineering, 2021, 185: 116363.
[17] LI Y M, HUNG T C, WU C J, et al.Experimental investigation of 3-kW organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system subject to heat source conditions: a new appraisal for assessment[J]. Energy, 2021, 217: 119342.
[18] HEBERLE F, THOMAS J, DIETER B.Thermodynamic analysis of double-stage organic rankine cycles for low-enthalpy sources based on a case study for 5.5 MWe power plant Kirchstockach (Germany)[C]// Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 2015.
基金
国家重点研发计划（2018YFB1501805）
PDF(1952 KB)
