利用地热能的双压有机朗肯循环性能分析

doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-0116

太阳能学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 437-443.DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-0116

利用地热能的双压有机朗肯循环性能分析

刘雪玲, 牛锦涛, 汪健生, 苏力德, 董丽玮

天津大学机械工程学院,中低温热能高效利用教育部重点实验室,天津 300350

收稿日期:2021-01-25 出版日期:2022-09-28 发布日期:2023-03-28
通讯作者: 汪健生（1964—）,男,博士、教授,主要从事动力循环优化方面的研究。jsw@tju.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2018YFB1501805）

THERMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF DOUBLE PRESSURE ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE DRIVEN BY GEOTHERM

Liu Xueling, Niu Jintao, Wang Jiansheng, Su Lide, Dong Liwei

Low and Medium Grade Energy of Ministry of Education, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China

Received:2021-01-25 Online:2022-09-28 Published:2023-03-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 根据地热利用系统回灌的要求,对热源在系统出口处的温度进行限制,研究了双压有机朗肯循环（DPORC）中的热量分配以及随运行时间的系统性能变化,针对5种不同的有机工质进行了计算分析。研究表明：系统热力学性能的最大值和有机工质流量的最小值在同样的k值（热源提供给高压循环的热量与热源为DPORC提供的热量比）处获得。而采用R600和R245fa系统的净输出功率较大;相比R601,采用R245fa可以将系统的净输出功率提高168.06 kW（5.55%）,热效率和效率分别可提高0.70%和2.86%。相比于单压有机朗肯循环（SPORC）,DPORC可以有效减小系统随运行时间净输出功率降低的幅度。经过40 a的运行,采用R601的系统净输出功率降低幅度最低（428.11 kW, 14.14%）,而采用R600系统的净输出功率降低幅度最大（526.75 kW, 16.55%）。

关键词: 有机朗肯循环, 地热能, 热力学性能, 高压循环热量占比, 运行时间

Abstract: According the requirement of system injection in geothermal utilization, the temperature of the heat source at the exit of the system is specified and 5 kinds of organic working medium with different critical temperatures are selected for thermodynamic calculation. The heat distribution and the performance of DPORC with running time were studied, and the results indicated that the maximum value of the thermodynamic parameters of the system and the minimum value of the flow of organic working medium were obtained at the same k （Ratio of heat provided by the heat source to the high-pressure cycle to heat provided by the heat source to DPORC） value. The net output power of system with R600 and R245fa as working fluid is larger. Compared with R601, the net output power of system with R245fa as fluid can increase by 168.06 kW （5.55%）, while thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency can increase by 0.70% and 2.86% respectively. Compared with single-pressure organic （SPORC）, DPORC can reduce the decrease of net output power with variable running time effectively. After 40 a of operation, R601 has the lowest net output power reduction （428.11 kW, 14.14%）, while R600 has the highest net output power reduction （526.75 kW, 16.55%）.

Key words: organic Rankine cycle, geothermal energy, thermodynamic performance, ratio of high-pressure cycle heat, running time

中图分类号:

TK124

刘雪玲, 牛锦涛, 汪健生, 苏力德, 董丽玮. 利用地热能的双压有机朗肯循环性能分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(9): 437-443.

Liu Xueling, Niu Jintao, Wang Jiansheng, Su Lide, Dong Liwei. THERMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF DOUBLE PRESSURE ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE DRIVEN BY GEOTHERM[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43(9): 437-443.

参考文献

[1] LI J,GE Z,DUAN Y Y, et al.Design and performance analyses for a novel organic Rankine cycle with supercritical-subcritical heat absorption process coupling[J]. Applied energy, 2019, 235: 1400-1414.
[2] ANDERSON A,REZAIE B.Geothermal technology: trends and potential role in a sustainable future[J]. Applied energy, 2019, 248: 18-34.
[3] ZHANG L X, PANG M Y, HAN J, et al.Geothermal power in China: development and performance evaluation[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2019, 116: 109431.
[4] YANG F B, CHO H J, ZHANG H G, et al.Thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization of a dual loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for CNG engine waste heat recovery[J]. Applied energy, 2017, 205: 1100-1118.
[5] LUO X L, YI Z T, ZHANG B J, et al.Mathematical modelling and optimization of the liquid separation condenser used in organic Rankine cycle[J]. Applied energy, 2017, 185: 1309-1323.
[6] BRAIMAKIS K,KARELLAS S.Exergetic optimization of double stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)[J]. Energy, 2018, 149: 296-313.
[7] LECOMPTE S, HUISSEUNE H, BROEK M V D, et al. Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2015, 47: 448-461.
[8] LI J, GE Z, DUAN Y Y, et al.Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles[J]. Applied energy, 2018, 217: 409-421.
[9] WANG M T, CHEN Y G, LIU Q Y, et al.Thermodynamic and thermo-economic analysis of dual-pressure and single pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles[J]. Energy conversion management, 2018, 177: 718-736.
[10] ZHAI H X, AN Q S, SHI L, et al.Categorization and analysis of heat sources for organic Rankine cycle systems[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2016, 64: 790-805.
[11] MA Y Y, LI S B, ZHANG L G, et al.Numerical simulation study on the heat extraction performance of multi-well injection enhanced geothermal system[J]. Renewable energy, 2020, 151: 782-795.
[12] HU S Z, LI J, YANG F B, et al.Thermodynamic analysis of serial dual-pressure organic Rankine cycle under off-design conditions[J]. Energy conversion and management, 2020, 213: 112837.
[13] HU S Z, LI J, YANG F B, et al.How to design organic Rankine cycle system under fluctuating ambient temperature: a multi-objective approach[J]. Energy conversion and management, 2020, 224: 113331.
[14] ZENG Y C, TANG L S, WU N Y, et al.Numerical simulation of electricity generation potential from fractured granite reservoir using the MINC method at the Yangbajing geothermal field[J]. Geothermics, 2018, 75: 122-136.
[15] ZHANG C, JIANG G Z, JIA X F, et al.Parametric study of the production performance of an enhanced geothermal system: a case study at the Qiabuqia geothermal area, northeast Tibetan plateau[J]. Renewable energy, 2019, 132: 959-978.
[16] LI D T, HE Z L, WANG Q, et al.Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a partial evaporating dual-pressure organic rankine cycle system for low-grade heat recovery[J]. Applied thermal engineering, 2021, 185: 116363.
[17] LI Y M, HUNG T C, WU C J, et al.Experimental investigation of 3-kW organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system subject to heat source conditions: a new appraisal for assessment[J]. Energy, 2021, 217: 119342.
[18] HEBERLE F, THOMAS J, DIETER B.Thermodynamic analysis of double-stage organic rankine cycles for low-enthalpy sources based on a case study for 5.5 MWe power plant Kirchstockach (Germany)[C]// Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 2015.

利用地热能的双压有机朗肯循环性能分析

THERMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF DOUBLE PRESSURE ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE DRIVEN BY GEOTHERM

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张也, 骆祖江, 杜建国, 成磊, 吕雅馨. 基于热平衡原理的地埋管地源热泵系统开发利用潜力评价[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(9): 444-452.
[2]	董志坚, 叶学民, 宋睿哲, 李春曦. 660 MW燃煤发电机组的碳捕集系统余热利用和集成系统性能评估[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(7): 203-211.
[3]	胡冰, 郭嘉俊, 黄斯珉. 低温地热双循环式发电系统横管喷淋降膜蒸发器传热性能实验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(7): 493-498.
[4]	柴森, 那金, 岳高凡, 袁益龙. 青海省共和县地下热水水文地球化学特征研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 270-276.
[5]	褚召祥, 王义江, 赵光思, 董凯军, 孙钦, 王泽桂. 砂土导热特性及表观热导率预测关联式模型[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(5): 1-9.
[6]	夏杰勤, 窦斌, 谷俊廷, Muhammad Kashif, 崔国栋, 陈劲. 深井CO₂爆破致裂干热岩系统综合效应预评价[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(5): 21-29.
[7]	曾姝, 闫振国, 张正威, 杨军. 基于浅层地热能流体加热技术的机场道面融雪方案[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(11): 376-382.
[8]	张琳邡, 张东海, 周扬, 高蓬辉, 赵鹏, 李晓昭. 分层岩土中地埋管换热器传热解析模型与分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(10): 378-385.