提出一种具有后弯管和直通管2种工作模式的新型振荡水柱装置,并通过水槽实验来探讨做功方式、波周期、波高及质量等因素对该装置从波浪能到气动能量转换的影响。水槽实验表明,当模型工作在后弯管模式下,气室中气流双向做功时,规则波中的俘获宽度比（CWR）最高可达138.6%,随机波中的CWR最高可达94%;气流单向做功时,规则波中CWR最高可达113.7%,随机波中CWR最高可达81.9%。当模型工作在直通管模式下,气流双向做功时,规则波中CWR最高可达81.1%,随机波中CWR最高可达66.2%;气流单向做功时,规则波中CWR最高可达53.9%,随机波中CWR最高可达42.1%。模型在随机波实验中后弯管、直通管工作模式的CWR峰值分别能达到“巨鲸号”的3倍、2倍,显然模型的后弯管工作模式具有更高的能量转换特性。
Abstract
A new oscillating water column device is proposed, which has two working modes of backward bent duct buoy（BBDB）and straight duct. Through the flume experiments, the influences of working mode, wave period, wave height and weight of the device on the conversion from wave energy to aerodynamic energy are discussed by flume experiment. The flume experiments show that when the model works in the BBDB mode, the Capture Width Ratio （CWR） can reach up to 138.6% under regular waves and 94% under random waves when airflow works bidirectionally, while the CWR can reach up to 113.7% under regular waves and 81.9% under random waves when the airflow in the chamber does work in both directions. When the model works in the straight duct mode, CWR can reach up to 81.1% under regular waves and 66.2% under random waves when the airflow in the chamber does work in both directions, while the CWR can reach up to 53.9% under regular waves and 42.1% under random waves when the airflow in the chamber does work in single direction. In the random wave experiment, the maximum CWR of the BBDB mode and the straight duct mode can reach 3 times and 2 times that of the “Mighty Whale” respectively. Obviously, the working mode of BBDB of the model has higher energy conversion characteristics.
关键词
波浪能 /
振荡水柱技术 /
俘获宽度比 /
后弯管 /
直通管
Key words
wave energy /
oscillating water column technology /
capture width ratio /
backward bent duct buoy /
straight duct
中图分类号：
TK212.+3
TV139.2+5
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 刘延俊, 贺彤彤. 波浪能利用发展历史与关键技术[J]. 海洋技术学报, 2017, 36(4): 76-81.
LIU Y J, HE T T.Wave energy utilization: history of development and key technologies[J]. Journal of ocean technology, 2017, 36(4): 76-81.
[2] ANTONIO F O, FALCOH J.Oscillating-water-column wave energy converters and air turbines: a review[J].Renewable energy, 2016, 85: 1391-1424.
[3] FALCO A, SARMENTO A, GATO L, et al.The Pico OWC wave power plant: its lifetime from conception to closure 1986-2018[J]. Applied ocean research, 2020, 98:102104.
[4] BABARIT A.A database of capture width ratio of wave energy converters[J]. Renewable energy, 2015, 80: 610-628.
[5] NING D Z, WANG R Q, CHEN L F, et al.Experimental investigation of a land-based dual-chamber OWC wave energy converter[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2019, 105: 48-60.
[6] WASHIO Y, OSAWA H, OGATA T.The open sea tests of the offshore floating type wave power device “Mighty Whale”-characteristics of wave energy absorption and power generation[C]//MTS/IEEE oceans 2001. An Ocean Odyssey. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No. 01CH37295), Honolulu, HI, USA, 2002.
[7] 吴必军, 李猛, 陈天祥, 等. 改进型中心管模型能量转换性能试验及样机设计[J]. 海洋工程, 2017, 35(1): 97-104.
WU B J, LI M, CHEN T X, et al.An experimental study on energy conversion of the modified centre pipe buoy and the design of prototypes[J]. The ocean engineering, 2017,35(1): 97-104.
[8] MASUDA Y.Experience in pneumatic wave energy conversion in Japan[C]//Proceeding of ASCE Specialty Conference on Utilization of Ocean Waves: Wave Energy Conversion, Rykusha CO, Japan, 1986.
[9] PATHAK A G, SUBRAMANIAN V A, MASUDA Y.Performance studies on a scaled model of backward bent ducted buoy (BBDB) type wave energy converter in regular and random waves[C]//Proceedings of the Ninth(1999)International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Brest, France, 1999.
[10] HONG D C, HONG S Y, HONG S W.Numerical study on the reverse drift force of floating BBDB wave energy absorbers[J]. Ocean engineering, 2004, 31(10): 1257-1294.
[11] HEATH T V.A review of oscillating water columns[J].Philosophical transactions: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 2012, 370(1959): 235-245.
[12] KIM S J, KOO W, KIM M H.Nonlinear time-domain NWT simulations for two types of a backward bent duct buoy (BBDB) compared with 2D wave-tank experiments[J]. Ocean engineering, 2015, 108: 584-593.
[13] BAILEY H, ROBERTSON B, BUCKHAM B J.Wave-to-wire simulation of a floating oscillating water column wave energy converter[J]. Ocean engineering, 2016, 125: 248-260.
[14] 粱贤光, 王伟, 杜斌, 等. 后弯管波力发电浮标模型性能试验研究[J]. 海洋工程, 1997, 15(3): 77-86.
LIANG X G, WANG W, DU B,et al.Experimental research on performance of BBDB wave-activated generation device model[J]. The ocean engineering, 1997,15(3): 77-86.
[15] 梁贤光, 孙培亚, 王伟, 等. 多点系泊下后弯管波力发电浮体模型试验研究[J]. 海洋工程, 2001, 19(1): 70-78.
LIANG X G, SUN P Y, WANG W, et al.Experimental study of BBDB model with multi-points moo ring[J]. Ocean engineering, 2001, 19(1): 70-78.
[16] 李猛, 吴必军, 伍儒康, 等. 前方后尖浮舱五边形后弯管水槽性能实验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2019, 40(12):3339-3347.
LI M, WU B J, WU R K, et al.Experimental study on performance of pentagonal backward bent duct buoy with buoyancy tank square in front and triangular in back in 2D wave tank[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2019, 40(12):3339-3347.
[17] XU S, REZANEJAD K, GADELHO J, et al.Experimental investigation on a dual chamber floating oscillating water column moored by flexible mooring systems[J]. Ocean engineering, 2020, 216(13): 108083.
[18] 梁贤光, 孙培亚, 王伟, 等. 往复流中双向导叶冲动透平模型性能试验研究[J]. 海洋工程, 2001, 9(4): 84-93.
LIANG X G, SUN P Y, WANG W, et al.Experiment study of 2-direction guide-vane turbine in to-and-fro air-flow[J]. Ocean engineering, 2001, 9(4): 84-93.
[19] 梁贤光, 孙培亚, 王伟, 等. SWBF 2.86×2.2后弯管波力发电导航灯浮标性能试验[J]. 新能源, 1998, 20(9): 4-10.
LIANG X G, SUN P Y, WANG W, et al.Performance test on the SWBF2.86×2.2 BBDB wave power navigation buoy[J]. New energy, 1998, 20(9): 4-10.
基金
国家自然科学基金（U20A20106; 51879253）
PDF(1775 KB)
