波浪能发电装置现场测试中波浪参数比测分析

夏海南; 王项南; 李强; 贾宁; 常皓; 赵智坤

doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-1081

PDF(2119 KB)

太阳能学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 251-255. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-1081

波浪能发电装置现场测试中波浪参数比测分析

夏海南¹, 王项南¹, 李强¹, 贾宁¹, 常皓², 赵智坤²

作者信息 +

COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF WAVE PARAMETERS IN FIELD TEST OF WAVE ENERGY CONVERTERS

Xia Hainan¹, Wang Xiangnan¹, Li Qiang¹, Jia Ning¹, Chang Hao², Zhao Zhikun²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

在波浪能发电装置现场测试工作中,波浪参数的测量是评估波浪能发电装置性能的重要依据之一。在分析和比较波浪骑士与浪龙的波浪测量方式基础上,开展对这2种设备在大万山海域现场的对比测试工作。应用标准差、皮尔逊相关系数等数学方法,对测试数据进行处理与分析,并绘制有效波高玫瑰图,分析这2种设备对波浪参数的测量差异性。结果表明,波浪骑士与浪龙对有效波高和波周期参数的测量差异性较小,对波向的测量差异性较为显著。研究成果为波浪能发电装置现场测试工作中波浪参数的测量提供了参考依据。

Abstract

In the field test of wave energy converters, the measurement of wave parameters is one of the important basis for evaluating the performance of wave energy converters. On the basis of analyzing and comparing the wave measurement methods of Directional Wave Rider and Langlong, a field test and comparison work of two devices are carried out, in the Dawanshan sea area. Using mathematical methods such as standard deviation and Pearson correlation coefficient, the test data are processed and analyzed, the wave rose diagram of significant wave height is drawn, and the measurement differences of wave parameters between the two devices are analyzed. The results show that, there is a little difference between Directional Ware Rider and Langlong in the measurement of significant wave height parameter and wave period parameter, but there is a significant difference in the measurement of wave direction. The research results provide a reference for the measurement of wave parameters in the field test of wave energy converters.

导出引用

夏海南, 王项南, 李强, 贾宁, 常皓, 赵智坤. 波浪能发电装置现场测试中波浪参数比测分析[J]. 太阳能学报. 2022, 43(6): 251-255 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-1081

Xia Hainan, Wang Xiangnan, Li Qiang, Jia Ning, Chang Hao, Zhao Zhikun. COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF WAVE PARAMETERS IN FIELD TEST OF WAVE ENERGY CONVERTERS[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica. 2022, 43(6): 251-255 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-1081

中图分类号： P743.2 TK79

参考文献

[1] 路宽, 王花梅, 韩林生. 不规则波下波浪能发电装置模型实验室入射波功率计算方法研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2020, 41(8): 36-40.
LU K, WANG H M, HAN L S.Calculation method of incident wave power of irregular wave for wave energy conversion model system[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2020, 41(8): 36-40.
[2] PRAKASH S S, MAMUN K A, ISLAM F R, et al.Wave energy converter: A review of wave energy conversion technology[C]//3rd Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering, Nadi, Fiji, 2016.
[3] 麻常雷. 中国海洋能产业发展2020[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2020: 11-13.
MA C L.The progress of China ocean energy industry 2020[M]. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 2020: 11-13.
[4] PECHER A, KOFOED J P.Handbook of ocean wave energy[M]. VoV. 7, Berlin: Springer Nature, 2016: 17-41.
[5] 章家保, 蔡辉, 陈加银, 等. 当前海洋波浪测量的技术特点和实测分析[J]. 海洋技术学报, 2015, 34(4): 33-38.
ZHANG J B, CAI H, CHEN J Y, et al.Current status of ocean wave measuring technologies: Features and case analysis[J]. Journal of ocean technology, 2015, 34(4): 33-38.
[6] 冯士筰, 李凤岐, 李少菁. 海洋科学导论[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1999: 397-433.
FENG S Z, LI F Q, LI S J.An introduction to marine science[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1999: 397-433.
[7] 盛松伟, 王坤林, 吝红军, 等. 100 kW鹰式波浪能发电装置“万山号”实海况试验[J]. 太阳能学报, 2019, 40(3): 709-714.
SHENG S W, WANG K L, LIN H J, et al.Open sea tests of 100 kW wave energy converter sharp eagle wanshan[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2019, 40(3): 709-714.
[8] WANG X N, YU Y H, XIA H N.Field test analysis of power characteristics of wave-energy-based generation device[J]. Chinese journal of scientific instrument, 2019 (1): 70-76.
[9] 刘建国, 周辉云, 王晓亮, 等. SZF2-1A型多参数波浪试验浮标波浪要素海上比测试验与初步分析[J]. 海洋技术学报, 2016, 35(3): 74-77.
LIU J G, ZHOU H Y, WANG X L, et al.Maritime comparative testing and preliminary analysis on the wave elements of the SZF2-1A multi-parameter wave test buoy[J]. Journal of ocean technology, 2016, 35(3): 74-77.
[10] 周庆伟, 封哲, 汪小勇, 等. 基于三种测波方法的实测数据对比分析[J]. 海洋技术学报, 2017, 36(3): 45-49.
ZHOU Q W, FENG Z, WANG X Y, et al.Comparison and analysis of the measured data based on three wave measurement methods[J]. Journal of ocean technology, 2017, 36(3): 45-49.
[11] ROEHRS J, CHRISTENSEN K H, HOLE L R, et al.Observation-based evaluation of surface wave effects on currents and trajectory forecasts[J]. Ocean dynamics, 2012, 62(10-12): 1519-1533.
[12] European Marine Energy Center. EMEC brochure: Pathway to commercialization[EB/OL].http://www.emec.org.uk/about-us/media-centre/downloads.
[13] 王项南, 夏海南, 张原飞, 等. 波浪能发电装置现场测试与评价分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2020, 41(8): 15-20.
WANG X N, XIA H N, ZHANG Y F, et al.Site testing and analyzing of wave energy converter[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2020, 41(8): 15-20.
[14] 郑崇伟, 周林. 近10年南海波候特征分析及波浪能研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2012, 33(8): 1349-1356.
ZHENG C W, ZHOU L.Wave climate and wave energy analysis of the South China Sea in recent 10 years[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2012, 33(8): 1349-1356.
[15] 黄骏, 宗涛, 陈文炜, 等. 测波浮标与ADCP的现场对比试验研究[J]. 海洋技术学报, 2017, 39(11): 127-131.
HUANG J, ZONG T, CHENG W W, et al.Comparative test research on wave buoy and ADCP[J]. Journal of ocean technology, 2017, 39(11): 127-131.
[16] 盛骤, 谢式千, 潘承毅. 概率论与数理统计[M]. 第4版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2008: 100-101.
SHENG Z, XIE S Q, PAN C Y.Probability and statistics[M]. 4th Ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2008: 100-101.
[17] 车远宏, 贾雍, 汤卓, 等. 皮尔逊相关系数在风电功率组合预测中的应用[J]. 广西电力, 2016, 39(3): 50-53.
CHE Y H, JIA Y, TANG Z, et al.Application of pearson correlation coefficient in wind power combination prediction[J]. Guangxi electric power, 2016, 39(3): 50-53.
[18] GB/Z 40295—2021, 波浪能转换装置发电性能评估[S].
GB/Z 40295—2021, Power performance assessment of electricity producing wave energy converters[S].
[19] 夏登文, 康健. 海洋能开发利用词典[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2014: 42-43.
XIA D W, KANG J.Dictionary of ocean energy[M]. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 2014: 42-43.
[20] 盛松伟, 张亚群, 游亚戈, 等. 大万山波浪能示范场波浪能资源测试分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2019, 40(2): 462-465.
SHENG S W, ZHANG Y Q, YOU Y G, et al.Testing and analysis of wave energy resources in dawanshan wave energy demonstration field[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2019, 40(2): 462-465.