晴空模型在北方地区的适用性研究&#x02014;&#x02014;以甘肃、河北部分地区为例

刘笑; 杨丽薇; 花家嘉; 高晓清; 贾东于

doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-1189

PDF(1453 KB)

太阳能学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3) : 1-7. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-1189

晴空模型在北方地区的适用性研究——以甘肃、河北部分地区为例

刘笑^1,2, 杨丽薇³, 花家嘉⁴, 高晓清³, 贾东于⁵

作者信息 +

RESEARCH ON APPLICABILITY OF CLEAR-SKY MODELS IN NORTHERN CHINA—TAKING SOME REGIONS IN HEBEI AND GANSU AS EXAMPLES

Liu Xiao^1,2, Yang Liwei³, Hua Jiajia⁴, Gao Xiaoqing³, Jia Dongyu⁵

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

为了研究晴空模型在中国北方地区的适用性,采用北方地区7个站点的逐分钟太阳总辐射数据以及MERRA-2分析数据,选取Reno方法筛选晴空时段,之后选取11个统计量对7个晴空模型的性能进行评估,并采用主成分分析方法对模型进行排名。结果表明：模型综合排名由高到低依次为MAC2、REST2V5、BIRD、INEICHEN、IQBAL-C、sSOLIS、ESRA。Dong MAC2和REST2V5模型计算晴空条件下的太阳辐射准确率较高,在北方地区的适用性较好。

Abstract

In order to study the applicability of clear-sky models in northern China, this study uses 1-minute global horizontal solar irradiance and MERRA-2 reanalysis data from seven stations in Northern China, selects the Reno method to filter clear-sky periods, evaluates the performance of seven clear-sky models by eleven statistics, and adopts the principal component analysis method to rank the models. The results, ranked in descending order (from high to low) are as follows: MAC2, REST2V5, BIRD, INEICHEN, IQBAL-C, sSOLIS, ESRA. The MAC2 and REST2V5 models have high accuracy in calculating solar radiation in clear sky and have good applicability in northern regions.

导出引用

刘笑, 杨丽薇, 花家嘉, 高晓清, 贾东于. 晴空模型在北方地区的适用性研究——以甘肃、河北部分地区为例[J]. 太阳能学报. 2023, 44(3): 1-7 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-1189

Liu Xiao, Yang Liwei, Hua Jiajia, Gao Xiaoqing, Jia Dongyu. RESEARCH ON APPLICABILITY OF CLEAR-SKY MODELS IN NORTHERN CHINA—TAKING SOME REGIONS IN HEBEI AND GANSU AS EXAMPLES[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica. 2023, 44(3): 1-7 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-1189

中图分类号： P49

参考文献

[1] ZHANG H L, XIN X Z, LI L, et al.Estimating global solar radiation using a hybrid parametric model from MODIS data over the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Solar energy, 2015, 112: 373-382.
[2] GAIRAA K, KHELLAF A, MESSLEM Y, et al.Estimation of the daily global solar radiation based on Box-Jenkins and ANN models: a combined approach[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2016, 57: 238-249.
[3] SUN X X, BRIGHT J M, GUEYMARD C A, et al.Worldwide performance assessment of 75 global clear-sky irradiance models using principal component analysis[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2019, 111: 550-570.
[4] ANTONANZAS-TORRES F, URRACA R, POLO J, et al.Clear sky solar irradiance models: a review of seventy models[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2019, 107: 374-387.
[5] ENGERER N A, MILLS F P.Validating nine clear sky radiation models in Australia[J]. Solar energy, 2015, 120: 9-24.
[6] MABASA B, LYSKO M D, TAZVINGA H, et al.The performance assessment of six global horizontal irradiance clear sky models in six climatological regions in South Africa[J]. Energies, 2021, 14(9): 2583-2606.
[7] INEICHEN P.Validation of models that estimate the clear sky global and beam solar irradiance[J]. Solar energy, 2016, 132: 332-344.
[8] GELARO R, MCCARTY W, SUÁREZ M J, et al. The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2)[J]. Journal of climate, 2017, 30(14): 5419-5454.
[9] BRIGHT J M, BAI X Y, ZHANG Y, et al.Irradpy: python package for MERRA-2 download, extraction and usage for clear-sky irradiance modelling[J]. Solar energy, 2020, 199: 685-693.
[10] SUN X X, BRIGHT J M, GUEYMARD C A, et al.Worldwide performance assessment of 95 direct and diffuse clear-sky irradiance models using principal component analysis[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2021, 135: 110087.
[11] BADESCU V, GUEYMARD C A, CHEVAL S, et al.Accuracy analysis for fifty-four clear-sky solar radiation models using routine hourly global irradiance measurements in Romania[J]. Renewable energy, 2013, 55: 85-103.
[12] GUEYMARD C A.Clear-sky irradiance predictions for solar resource mapping and large-scale applications: improved validation methodology and detailed performance analysis of 18 broadband radiative models[J]. Solar energy, 2012, 86(8): 2145-2169.
[13] GUEYMARD C A.REST2: high-performance solar radiation model for cloudless-sky irradiance, illuminance, and photosynthetically active radiation-validation with a benchmark dataset[J]. Solar energy, 2008, 82(3): 272-285.
[14] GUEYMARD C A.Direct solar transmittance and irradiance predictions with broadband models. Part I: detailed theoretical performance assessment[J]. Solar energy, 2003, 74(5): 355-379.
[15] GUEYMARD C A.Direct solar transmittance and irradiance predictions with broadband models. Part II: validation with high-quality measurements[J]. Solar energy, 2003, 74(5): 381-395.
[16] IQBAL M.An introduction to solar radiation[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012.
[17] BIRD R E, HULSTROM R L.Simplified clear sky model for direct and diffuse insolation on horizontal surfaces[R]. Solar Energy Research Inst., Golden, CO(USA), 1981.
[18] DAVIES J A, MCKAY D C.Estimating solar irradiance and components[J]. Solar energy, 1982, 29(1): 55-64.
[19] MUELLER R W, DAGESTAD K F, INEICHEN P, et al.Rethinking satellite-based solar irradiance modelling: the SOLIS clear-sky module[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2004, 91(2): 160-174.
[20] INEICHEN P.A broadband simplified version of the Solis clear sky model[J]. Solar energy, 2008, 82(8): 758-762.
[21] RIGOLLIER C, BAUER O, WALD L.On the clear sky model of the ESRA—European Solar Radiation Atlas—with respect to the Heliosat method[J]. Solar energy, 2000, 68(1): 33-48.
[22] INEICHEN P, PEREZ R.A new airmass independent formulation for the Linke turbidity coefficient[J]. Solar energy, 2002, 73(3): 151-157.
[23] GUEYMARD C A, BRIGHT J M, LINGFORS D, et al.A posteriori clear-sky identification methods in solar irradiance time series: review and preliminary validation using sky imagers[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2019, 109: 412-427.
[24] RENO M J, HANSEN C W.Identification of periods of clear sky irradiance in time series of GHI measurements[J]. Renewable energy, 2016, 90: 520-531.
[25] GUEYMARD C A.A review of validation methodologies and statistical performance indicators for modeled solar radiation data: towards a better bankability of solar projects[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2014, 39: 1024-1034.
[26] WILKS D S.Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences[M]. New York: Academic Press, 2011.
[27] 刘潇, 薛莹, 纪毓鹏, 等. 基于主成分分析法的黄河口及其邻近水域水质评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015, 35(10): 3187-3192.
LIU X, XUE Y, JI Y P, et al.An assessment of water quality in the Yellow River estuary and its adjacent waters based on principal component analysis[J]. China environmental science, 2015, 35(10): 3187-3192.
[28] 吴澎, 贾朝爽, 范苏仪, 等. 樱桃品种果实品质因子主成分分析及模糊综合评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(17): 291-300.
WU P, JIA C S, FAN S Y, et al.Principal component analysis and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality in cultivars of cherry[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(17): 291-300.
[29] 成珂, 孙琦琦, 马晓瑶. 基于主成分回归分析的气象因子对光伏发电量的影响[J].太阳能学报, 2021, 42(2):403-409.
CHENG K, SUN Q Q, MA X Y.Influence of meteorological factors on photovoltaic power generation based on principal component regression analysis[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2021, 42(2): 403-409.