燃料电池船舶舱内氢气泄漏爆炸的数值模拟研究

doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2022-0871

太阳能学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 540-549.DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2022-0871

燃料电池船舶舱内氢气泄漏爆炸的数值模拟研究

袁裕鹏^1~3, 崔伟逸^2,4, 沈辉^1,2, 童亮^1,2, 邹智曦⁵

1.武汉理工大学交通与物流工程学院可靠性与新能源研究所,武汉 430063;
2.武汉理工大学国家水运安全工程技术研究中心,武汉 430063;
3.中国远洋海运集团有限公司院士工作站,上海 200135;
4.武汉理工大学船海与能源动力工程学院,武汉 430063;
5.舟山中远海运重工有限公司,舟山 316131

收稿日期:2022-06-15 出版日期:2022-12-28 发布日期:2023-06-28
通讯作者: 童亮（1988—）,男,博士后,主要从事氢气储存和纯化等方面的研究。tongliang2@whut.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2021YFB2601603）

RESEARCH ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF HYDROGEN EXPLOSION IN COMPARTMENT OF FUEL CELL SHIP

Yuan Yupeng^1-3, Cui Weiyi^2,4, Shen Hui^1,2, Tong Liang^1,2, Zou Zhixi⁵

1. Reliability and New Energy Institute, School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China;
2. National Engineering Research Center for Water Transport Safety （WTS Center）, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China;
3. Academician Workstation of COSCO SHIPPING Group, Shanghai 200135, China;
4. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean Energy Power Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China;
5. COSCO SHIPPING Heavy Industry （Zhoushan） Co., Ltd., Zhoushan 316131, China

Received:2022-06-15 Online:2022-12-28 Published:2023-06-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以燃料电池客船“Water-Go-Round”号为对象,利用FLUENT软件模拟燃料电池客船舱内管道发生氢气泄漏并引发爆炸的情况,研究不同舱室氢气点火爆炸事故的影响规律。结果表明：可燃氢气云被点燃后,爆炸超压波自点火位置向四周迅速传播,点火位置对超压波的分布影响较大;控制舱爆炸时,超压强度最大,对船体超压危害最大;乘客舱爆炸强度最小,但超压中心分布在乘客舱,超压对乘客造成的危害最大;船舶舱室燃烧火焰温度主要由可燃氢气云的分布决定,燃料电池舱的火焰衰减趋势基本相同;乘客舱受到的高温危害较低,船艏舱无燃烧火焰的高温危害。

关键词: 氢气, 燃料电池, 泄漏, 爆炸, FLUENT, 数值模拟

Abstract: Taking a fuel cell passenger ship “Water Go Round” as the research object in this work, the process of hydrogen leakage and explosion of the pipeline in the compartment of this ship is simulated based on theFLUENT software platform. The effect of different hydrogen ignition positions on the accident is studied. The results show that the explosion shock wave propagates rapidly from the ignition position to the surrounding after the flammable hydrogen cloud is ignited, and the ignition position has great influence on the distribution of the shock wave. When the explosion position is in the control compartment, the overpressure strength is greatest, which leads to great damage to the hull of this ship. When the explosion position is in the passenger compartment, the explosion intensity is relatively low. However, considering the overpressure center is distributed in the passenger compartment, the overpressure causes great harm to people. The flame temperature in the ship compartment is mainly determined by the distribution of flammable hydrogen cloud. The flame attenuation trend in the fuel cell compartment is basically the same. The high temperature hazard to the passenger compartment is relatively low, and there is no high temperature hazard of combustion flame in the fore compartment.

Key words: hydrogen, fuel cell, leakage, explosion, FLUENT, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

U665.13

袁裕鹏, 崔伟逸, 沈辉, 童亮, 邹智曦. 燃料电池船舶舱内氢气泄漏爆炸的数值模拟研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(12): 540-549.

Yuan Yupeng, Cui Weiyi, Shen Hui, Tong Liang, Zou Zhixi. RESEARCH ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF HYDROGEN EXPLOSION IN COMPARTMENT OF FUEL CELL SHIP[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43(12): 540-549.

参考文献

[1] UNCTAD. Review of maritime transport2016[R]. ISSN 0566-7682, 2016.
[2] HERATH I, MADELEY D, BRADSHAW B.Hydrogen fuel cell taxi: safety analysis experiences[C]//4th IET International Conference on Systems Safety 2009, Incorporating the SaRS Annual Conference, IET, London, United Kingdom, 2009.
[3] LI F, YUAN Y P, YAN X P, et al.A study on numerical simulation of hydrogen leakage in cabin of fuel cell ship[J]. Journal of transport information and safety, 2017, 35(6): 60-66.
[4] SCHEFER R W, GROETHE M, HOUF W G, et al.Experimental evaluation of barrier walls for risk reduction of unintended hydrogen releases[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2009, 34(3): 1590-1606.
[5] SHIRVILL C L, ROBERTS P, BUTLER J C, et a1. Characterisation of the hazards from jet releases of hydrogen[C]//2nd International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, San Sebastian, Spain, 2007.
[6] SATO Y, IWABUCHI H, GROETHE M, et al.Experiments on hydrogen deflagration[J]. Journal of power sources, 2006, 159(1): 144-148.
[7] VENETSANOS A G, BARALDI D, ADAMS P, et a1. CFD modelling of hydrogen release, dispersion and combustion for automotive scenarios[J]. Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 2008, 21(2): 162-184.
[8] KIM B, HWANG K I.Numerical analysis of the effects of ship motion on hydrogen release and dispersion in an enclosed area[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(3): 1259.
[9] 余照, 袁杰红. 储氢罐泄漏扩散规律的数值仿真分析[J]. 轻工科技, 2008(8): 19-21.
YU Z, YUAN J H, Simulation and analasis on hydrogen tank leaking[J]. Light industry science and technology, 2008(8): 19-21.
[10] 周理. 高压氢气泄漏自燃现象的模拟[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2014.
ZHOU L.Numerical study on spontaneous ignition process of pressurized hydrogen release[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2014.
[11] 李峰. 燃料电池船氢气系统设计与氢泄露数值模拟研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2018: 35-50.
LI F.Study on the design of hydrogen system and numerical simulation of hydrogen leakage in fuel cell passenger ship[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2018: 35-50.
[12] 刘茂. 事故风险分析理论与方法[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012: 61-62, 161-162.
LIU M.Theory and method of accident risk analysis[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2012: 61-62, 161-162.
[13] ANSYS Inc.ANSYS Fluent 14.5 user’s guide[M]. Canonsburg: ANSYS Inc., 2012.
[14] OKUMURA M, TERUI K, LKADO A, et al.Investigation of wall stress development and packing ratio distribution in the metal hydride reactor[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2012, 37(8): 6686-6693.
[15] 艾志久, 吴光武, 王其华, 等. 井喷失控气云爆炸的三维数值模拟[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2010, 30(1): 96-100.
AI Z J, WU G W, WANG Q H, et al, Three-dimensional numerical simulation of gas cloud explosion induced by well blowout[J]. Explosion and shock waves, 2010, 30(1): 96-100.
[16] MONTIEL H, VÍLCHEZ J A, CASAL J, et al. Mathematical modelling of accidental gas releases[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 1998, 59(2-3): 211-233.
[17] 焦明宇. 燃料电池卡车供氢系统氢气泄漏扩散仿真分析研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2021.
JIAO M Y.Research on simulation analysis of hydrogen leakage and diffusion in hydrogen supply system of fuel cell truck[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2021.
[18] 李雪芳. 储氢系统意外氢气泄漏和扩散研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2015.
LI X F.Dispersion of unintended subsonic and supersonic hydrogen releases from hydrogen storage systems[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2015.
[19] BLAYLOCK M L, PRATT J W, BRAN ANLEU G A, et al. Informing hazardous zones for on-board maritime hydrogen liquid and gas systems[R].SAND-2017-0585, 2018.

燃料电池船舶舱内氢气泄漏爆炸的数值模拟研究

RESEARCH ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF HYDROGEN EXPLOSION IN COMPARTMENT OF FUEL CELL SHIP

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李昊琦, 魏利平, 庄子贤, 郑茂盛. 光伏相变系统温控特性及散热结构优化设计[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(9): 57-63.
[2]	李勇霞, 段立强, 潘盼, 郭耀飞. 基于太阳能热驱动甲烷重整制氢的燃料电池发电系统性能研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(9): 131-138.
[3]	李勇, 宋旺, 刘艳峰, 陈耀文, 王登甲, 刘加平. 多级相变太阳能通风吊顶蓄放热特性研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(9): 155-162.
[4]	黄晨昱, 李念平, 阿勇嘎, 袁宸章, 汪泳思, 陆美瑶. 太阳辐射对辐射地板供冷性能的影响[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(9): 169-175.
[5]	高萌, 周勇, 王登甲, 刘艳峰. 波纹形太阳能通风预热墙热效率简化计算方法[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(9): 176-183.
[6]	武贺, 方舣洲, 张松, 马勇. 南海岛礁海域波浪能资源分析及总量评估[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(9): 416-423.
[7]	宋冠强, 王依芮, 赵贯甲, 尹建国, 马素霞. 70 MPa Ⅲ型车载储氢气瓶充氢过程的热力学响应特性模拟[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(9): 488-492.
[8]	杨卫战, 谈金祝, 刘嘉然, 夏威, 王燕康. 模拟PEM燃料电池环境下质子交换膜损伤研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(9): 493-498.
[9]	王沛, 李嘉宝, 周领, 刘德有. 太阳能热化学反应器多场耦合及协同优化研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(9): 527-534.
[10]	胡宝琳, 吴仁杰, 周磊, 邹燕. 固定式光伏支架受力性能与试验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(8): 116-121.
[11]	秦智胜, 张赫男, 林成楷, 吴璠, 程远达. 新型管板式太阳能PV/T集热器光热特性研究与优化[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(8): 130-136.
[12]	石磊, 许思传, 刘泽. 基于人工神经网络的3 kW质子交换膜燃料电池电堆一致性优化[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(8): 498-503.
[13]	刘志恩, 罗玉兰, 周辉, 卢炽华, 杜常清. 燃料电池空气系统增湿器建模与仿真[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(8): 504-509.
[14]	赵金国, 郭恒. 氢燃料电池氢气利用率提升策略研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(8): 510-516.
[15]	金致含, 苏建徽, 施永, 汪海宁. 基于二进制序列的燃料电池宽频带EIS测试[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(7): 1-8.