基于改进AHP-TOPSIS的储能电站安全综合评估

宁雪峰, 张慧珍, 许加柱

太阳能学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5) : 251-259.

PDF(1805 KB)
欢迎访问《太阳能学报》官方网站,今天是
PDF(1805 KB)
太阳能学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5) : 251-259. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2022-1981

基于改进AHP-TOPSIS的储能电站安全综合评估

  • 宁雪峰1, 张慧珍2, 许加柱2
作者信息 +

COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY EVALUATION OF ENERGY STORAGE POWER STATION BASED ON IMPROVED AHP-TOPSIS

  • Ning Xuefeng1, Zhang Huizhen2, Xu Jiazhu2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为保障电池储能电站的安全运行,提出一种基于改进层次分析法(AHP)-逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)的储能电站安全综合评估方法。首先,综合考虑多方面评估指标,建立储能电站安全综合评估指标体系,对储能电站的安全状态进行全面、客观评估。其次,采用基于指数标度的改进AHP对各评估指标赋权,使得一致性最优,权重系数更精确可靠。然后,通过设计评估参考方案,采用改进TOPSIS实现各储能方案的横向对比及各储能方案与参考方案间的纵向对比,并确定各储能方案的安全等级。最后,以某地4个储能电站安全性能的综合评估为例,验证所提评估指标体系和评估方法的可行性与有效性。

Abstract

In order to ensure the safety operation of battery energy storage power station, a comprehensive safety evaluation method is proposed based on improved analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS). Firstly, an evaluation index system is established by considering various evaluation indexes, so as to comprehensively and objectively evaluate the safety state of energy storage power station. Then, an improved AHP method based on exponential scale is adopted to determine the weight of each evaluation indicator, which makes the consistency optimal and the weight coefficient more accurate and reliable. Furthermore, through the design of the evaluation reference schemes, an improved TOPSIS is used to realize the horizontal comparison between different energy storage schemes and the vertical comparison between energy storage scheme and the reference schemes, and then the safety level of each energy storage scheme is determined. Finally, taking the comprehensive safety state evaluation of four energy storage power stations as an example, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed evaluation index system and evaluation method are verified.

关键词

电池储能 / 风险评估 / 层次分析法 / 综合评估指标体系 / 逼近理想解排序法

Key words

battery storage / risk assessment / analytic hierarchy process / comprehensive evaluation index system / TOPSIS

引用本文

导出引用
宁雪峰, 张慧珍, 许加柱. 基于改进AHP-TOPSIS的储能电站安全综合评估[J]. 太阳能学报. 2024, 45(5): 251-259 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2022-1981
Ning Xuefeng, Zhang Huizhen, Xu Jiazhu. COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY EVALUATION OF ENERGY STORAGE POWER STATION BASED ON IMPROVED AHP-TOPSIS[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica. 2024, 45(5): 251-259 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2022-1981
中图分类号: TM912   

参考文献

[1] 谢小荣, 马宁嘉, 刘威, 等. 新型电力系统中储能应用功能的综述与展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43(1): 158-169.
XIE X R, MA N J, LIU W, et al.Functions of energy storage in renewable energy dominated power systems: review and prospect[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43(1): 158-169.
[2] 陈海生, 刘畅, 徐玉杰, 等. 储能在碳达峰碳中和目标下的战略地位和作用[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2021, 10(5): 1477-1485.
CHEN H S, LIU C, XU Y J, et al.The strategic position and role of energy storage under the goal of carbon peak and carbon neutrality[J]. Energy storage science and technology, 2021, 10(5): 1477-1485.
[3] ERDIWANSYAH E, MAHIDIN T, HUSIN H, et al.A critical review of the integration of renewable energy sources with various technologies[J]. Protection and control of modern power systems, 2021, 6(1): 1-18.
[4] NGUYEN N, BERA A, MITRA J.Energy storage to improve reliability of wind integrated systems under frequency security constraint[J]. IEEE transactions on industry applications, 2018, 54(5): 4039-4047.
[5] 赵冬梅, 徐辰宇, 陶然, 等. 多元分布式储能在新型电力系统配电侧的灵活调控研究综述[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43(5): 1776-1799.
ZHAO D M, XU C Y, TAO R, et al.Review on flexible regulation of multiple distributed energy storage in distribution side of new power system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43(5): 1776-1799.
[6] 徐国栋, 王坚嵘, 石一峰, 等. 电池储能电站安全问题分析与对策[J]. 电力安全技术, 2020, 22(9): 60-63.
XU G D, WANG J R, SHI Y F, et al.Analysis and countermeasures for safety problems of battery energy storage power stations[J]. Electric safety technology, 2020, 22(9): 60-63.
[7] 吴岩, 田培根, 肖曦, 等. 基于前兆信息的可重构梯次电池储能系统安全风险评估[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(4): 36-45.
WU Y, TIAN P G, XIAO X, et al.Security risk assessment of reconfigurable secondary battery energy storage system based on precursor information[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2022, 43(4): 36-45.
[8] LI X, WANG Q S, CHEN Y, et al.Safety analysis of energy storage station based on DFMEA[J]. E3S web of conferences, 2021, 236: 01006.
[9] 王博石, 余娟, 杨燕, 等. 基于重构误差计算的数据驱动储能电池热失控预警方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43(11): 4244-4254.
WANG B S, YU J, YANG Y, et al.A data-driven thermal runaway early warning method for energy storage battery with reconstruction error calculation[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2023, 43(11): 4244-4254.
[10] 曹文炅, 雷博, 史尤杰, 等. 韩国锂离子电池储能电站安全事故的分析及思考[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2020, 9(5): 1539-1547.
CAO W J, LEI B, SHI Y J, et al.Ponderation over the recent safety accidents of lithium-ion battery energy storage stations in South Korea[J]. Energy storage science and technology, 2020, 9(5): 1539-1547.
[11] 蔡晶菁. 锂离子电池储能电站火灾防控技术研究综述[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2022, 41(4): 472-477.
CAI J J.Review on the fire prevention and control technology for lithium-ion battery energy storage power station[J]. Fire science and technology, 2022, 41(4): 472-477.
[12] LIU M J, LI W Y, WANG C S, et al.Reliability evaluation of large scale battery energy storage systems[J]. IEEE transactions on smart grid, 2017, 8(6): 2733-2743.
[13] FIORAVANTI R, KUMAR K, NAKATA S, et al.Predictive-maintenance practices: for operational safety of battery energy storage systems[J]. IEEE power and energy magazine, 2020, 18(6): 86-97.
[14] 李建林, 武亦文, 王楠, 等. 吉瓦级电化学储能电站信息架构与安防体系综述[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(23): 179-191.
LI J L, WU Y W, WANG N, et al.Review of information architecture and security system of gigawatt electrochemical energy storage power station[J]. Automation of electric power systems, 2021, 45(23): 179-191.
[15] 陈豪, 刁嘉, 白恺, 等. 储能锂电池运行状态综合评估指标研究[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(5): 149-156.
CHEN H, DIAO J, BAI K, et al.Research on evaluation indicators for a comprehensive assessment of operating status of lithium battery energy storage[J]. Electric power, 2016, 49(5): 149-156.
[16] 于璐, 张辉, 田培根, 等. 一种梯次利用电池可重构储能系统多级在线安全评估及风险预警定位方法[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(5): 461-467.
YU L, ZHANG H, TIAN P G, et al.Multi-level on-line safety assessment of reconfigurable energy storage system using secondary batteries risk warning positioning method[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2022, 43(5): 461-467.
[17] 肖勇, 徐俊. 基于组合赋权与TOPSIS的储能电站电池安全运行风险评价[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(8): 2574-2584.
XIAO Y, XU J.Risk assessment of battery safe operation in energy storage power station based on combination weighting and TOPSIS[J]. Energy storage science and technology, 2022, 11(8): 2574-2584.
[18] 李勇, 何蕾, 庞传军, 等. 基于层次分析法的火电厂运行情况量化评价方法[J]. 电网技术, 2015, 39(2): 500-504.
LI Y, HE L, PANG C J, et al.An analytical hierarchy process based quantitative method to evaluate operating condition of thermal power plant[J]. Power system technology, 2015, 39(2): 500-504.
[19] ROZGA P, KRASLAWSKI A, KLARECKI A, et al.A new approach for decision support of the selection of construction technology of high-voltage substations based on AHP method[J]. IEEE access, 2021, 9: 73413-73423.
[20] 付志扬, 王涛, 孔令号, 等. 基于AHP-TOPSIS算法的重要电力客户用电状态评估[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46(10): 4095-4101.
FU Z Y, WANG T, KONG L H, et al.Power consumption state evaluation of important power customers based on AHP-TOPSIS algorithm[J]. Power system technology, 2022, 46(10): 4095-4101.
[21] ZHANG M X, SUN Q J, YANG X.Research on the assessment of the capacity of urban distribution networks to accept electric vehicles based on the improved TOPSIS method[J]. IET generation, transmission & distribution, 2021, 15(19): 2804-2818.
[22] 邱伟强, 王茂春, 林振智, 等. “双碳”目标下面向新能源消纳场景的共享储能综合评价[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2021, 41(10): 244-255.
QIU W Q, WANG M C, LIN Z Z, et al.Comprehensive evaluation of shared energy storage towards new energy accommodation scenario under targets of carbon emission peak and carbon neutrality[J]. Electric power automation equipment, 2021, 41(10): 244-255.
[23] 侯健敏, 徐志豪, 余威杰, 等. 基于灰色-前景改进优劣解距离法的多气候区建筑三联供系统多准则评估[J]. 电网技术, 2023, 47(7): 2659-2673.
HOU J M, XU Z H, YU W J, et al.Multi-criterion evaluation framework of building triple supply system in multi-climate regions based on grey-prospect TOPSIS[J]. Power system technology, 2023, 47(7): 2659-2673.
[24] GB/T 36549—2018, 电化学储能电站运行指标及评价[S].
GB/T 36549—2018, Operation index and evaluation of electrochemical energy storage power station[S].

基金

南方电网公司科技项目(031900KK52220037)

PDF(1805 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/