加氢站预算定额消耗量准确性的影响因素升策略研究

孙春玲, 郑晓茹, 柯洪, 张静

太阳能学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10) : 54-60.

PDF(945 KB)
欢迎访问《太阳能学报》官方网站,今天是
PDF(945 KB)
太阳能学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10) : 54-60. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2023-0976

加氢站预算定额消耗量准确性的影响因素升策略研究

  • 孙春玲, 郑晓茹, 柯洪, 张静
作者信息 +

INFLUENCE FACTORS OF BUDGETARY QUOTA CONSUMPTION ACCURACY IN HYDROGEN REFUELING STATIONS

  • Sun Chunling, Zheng Xiaoru, Ke Hong, Zhang Jing
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

分别从定额编制、施工安装、外部环境3个层面识别加氢站预算定额消耗量准确性的影响因素,通过因子分析法对影响因素进行公因子提取和关键因素提炼。结果表明:5个公因子对加氢站预算定额准确性皆有显著影响,其影响程度为编制方法与依据>施工安装技术>施工组织管理>编制组织与成员>外部环境;安装技术更新速度、编制方法与测定对象的匹配性和施工工艺规范度是影响消耗量准确性的关键因素。据此探讨消耗量准确性的提升策略:缩短定额修订时间,建立长效管理机制;提高编制方法与测定对象的匹配度;明确加氢站现场施工规范,缩小施工偏差影响。

Abstract

Identify the factors affecting the accuracy of the consumption of hydrogen refueling station budget quotas at three levels: quotas preparation, construction and installation, and external environment, respectively. The common factors and key factors were extracted by analysis. The results show that all five metric factors significantly affect the accuracy of the budget quotas for hydrogen refueling stations. The degree of influence is F1(preparation method and basis)>F4(construction and installation technology)>F3(construction organization and management)>F2(preparation organization and members>F5(external environment). The speed of installation technology update, the matching of the preparation method with the measurement object, and the specification of the construction process are the key factors affecting the accuracy of consumption. Accordingly, we discuss the strategies to improve the accuracy of consumption were discussed: shorten the revision time of the quota and establish a long-term management mechanism; improve the matching degree between the preparation method and the measurement object; clarify the on-site construction specification of hydrogenation station and narrow the influence of construction deviation.

关键词

氢能 / 造价工程 / 因子分析 / 预算定额 / 消耗量准确性 / 影响因素分析

Key words

hydrogen / cost engineering / factor analysis / budget quota / consumption accuracy / influence factor analysis

引用本文

导出引用
孙春玲, 郑晓茹, 柯洪, 张静. 加氢站预算定额消耗量准确性的影响因素升策略研究[J]. 太阳能学报. 2024, 45(10): 54-60 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2023-0976
Sun Chunling, Zheng Xiaoru, Ke Hong, Zhang Jing. INFLUENCE FACTORS OF BUDGETARY QUOTA CONSUMPTION ACCURACY IN HYDROGEN REFUELING STATIONS[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica. 2024, 45(10): 54-60 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2023-0976
中图分类号: TK91   

参考文献

[1] 李亮荣, 彭建, 付兵, 等. 碳中和愿景下绿色制氢技术发展趋势及应用前景分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 508-520.
LI L R, PENG J, FU B, et al.Development trend and application prospect of green hydrogen production technologies under carbon neutrality vision[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2022, 43(6): 508-520.
[2] 刘峻, 赵汪, 高学强, 等. 全球加氢站产业、技术及标准进展综述[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 362-372.
LIU J, ZHAO W, GAO X Q, et al.Review on advances in industry, technology, and standard of global hydrogen refuelling stations[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2022, 43(6): 362-372.
[3] 李华洋, 谭强, 陈家傲, 等. 基于文献计量法的中国氢能研究历程[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(5): 276-288.
LI H Y, TAN Q, CHEN J A, et al.Evolution of hydrogen energy research in China based on bibliometric analysis[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2024, 45(5): 276-288.
[4] 柯洪. 项目管理视角下工程投资管控制度的建立和发展(一): 第一阶段, 20世纪50~90年代初[J]. 工程造价管理, 2020(4): 11-15.
KE H.Establishment and development of project investment control degree from the perspective of project management(a)[J]. Engineering cost management, 2020(4): 11-15.
[5] 许尔淑, 钟文龙, 张红标. 城市轨道交通工程定额编制研究[J]. 建筑经济, 2022, 43(6): 65-69.
XU E S, ZHONG W L, ZHANG H B.Study on the quota compilation of urban rail transit engineering[J]. Construction economy, 2022, 43(6): 65-69.
[6] 赵元发, 司杨, 麻林瑞, 等. 交通网-电网耦合框架下制氢加氢站选址定容[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(8): 54-62.
ZHAO Y F, SI Y, MA L R, et al.Location and capacity determination of hydrogen production and refueling stations in coupling framework of transportation network and power grid[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2024, 45(8): 54-62.
[7] 郑玉华, 卞安娜, 刘兆军. 基于蒙特卡洛模拟方法的加氢站投资风险评估[J]. 天然气与石油, 2022, 40(3): 138-146.
ZHENG Y H, BIAN A N, LIU Z J.Risk assessment for investment of hydrogen refueling station based on Monte Carlo Simulation[J]. Natural gas and oil, 2022, 40(3): 138-146.
[8] 聂志理, 张爱平, 李靖. 建设单位编制新工艺定额的实践: 以北京轨道交通不降水(少降水)新工艺定额为例[J]. 建筑经济, 2022, 43(3): 74-81.
NIE Z L, ZHANG A P, LI J.Practice of new technology quota compiled by construction units: based on new technology quota with no precipitation (less precipitation) of Beijing rail transit[J]. Construction economy, 2022, 43(3): 74-81.
[9] 杨亭栋, 李群善, 刘浩忠, 等. 基于改进统计模型的隧道定额最佳样本量研究[J]. 隧道建设, 2016, 36(10): 1245-1250.
YANG T D, LI Q S, LIU H Z, et al.Studies of optimal sample quantity of tunnel norm based on improved statistical model[J]. Tunnel construction, 2016, 36(10): 1245-1250.
[10] 郭琦, 何湘君. 基于BP神经网络的水电工程定额编制模型研究[J]. 人民长江, 2016, 47(5): 69-72, 80.
GUO Q, HE X J.Hydropower projects quota preparing model based on BP neural network[J]. Yangtze river, 2016, 47(5): 69-72, 80.
[11] 顾玲俐, 吴一梅, 尹立坤, 等. 加氢站流程和配置技术现状与展望[J]. 新能源进展, 2021, 9(5): 418-425.
GU L L, WU Y M, YIN L K, et al.Status and prospect of process and configuration technology for hydrogen refueling station[J]. Advances in new and renewable energy, 2021, 9(5): 418-425.
[12] 帖卉霞. 基于AHP法的公路工程定额人工单价影响因素比较分析[J]. 建筑经济, 2022, 43(增刊1): 180-184.
TIE H X.Influencing factors comparative analysis of quota labor unit price for highway engineering based on AHP method[J]. Construction economy, 2022, 43(S1): 180-184.
[13] 杨柳, 梁笑语, 李雪, 等. 基于灰色模糊理论的农业水利工程定额消耗量模型及应用[J]. 水电能源科学, 2020, 38(9): 154-158.
YANG L, LIANG X Y, LI X, et al.Quota consumption model of agricultural water conservancy engineering based on grey fuzzy theory and its application[J]. Water resources and power, 2020, 38(9): 154-158.
[14] 黄馨怡. 建筑工程预算定额消耗量准确性影响因素研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2021.
HUANG X Y.Research on factors influencing the accuracy of construction engineering budget quota consumption[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2021.
[15] 王舒琪, 竹隰生. 建筑施工企业定额建立的障碍因素研究[J]. 建筑经济, 2017, 38(6): 10-13.
WANG S Q, ZHU X S.Research on the establishment of obstructing factors of construction enterprise quota[J]. Construction economy, 2017, 38(6): 10-13.
[16] 阮海波. 农民工就业服务满意度的实证分析: 基于有序多分类Logistic模型[J]. 调研世界, 2019(12): 40-45.
RUAN H B.An empirical analysis on the satisfaction of migrant workers’employment service: based on ordered multi-classified logistic model[J]. The world of survey and research, 2019(12): 40-45.
[17] FIELD A.Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics[M]. Sage Publications Limited, 2024.
[18] 高敏, 郝生跃. 我国建筑业BIM应用影响因素研究: 基于因子分析法[J]. 工程管理学报, 2019, 33(4): 38-42.
GAO M, HAO S Y.A study of influencing factors for BIM application in Chinese construction industry based on factor analysis[J]. Journal of engineering management, 2019, 33(4): 38-42.
[19] 刘华, 郭蓝晗. 施工现场建筑废弃物减量化管理及效果的实证分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(4): 1733-1742.
LIU H, GUO L H.Empirical analysis of the on-site reduction management and its influence on the construction waste[J]. Journal of safety and environment, 2021, 21(4): 1733-1742.

基金

国家自然科学基金(72072126)

PDF(945 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/