大型海上风电机组结构在风波联合作用下的非线性动力响应分析

林仁; 陈俊岭; 冯又全

doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1474

PDF(1923 KB)

太阳能学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1) : 424-431. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1474

大型海上风电机组结构在风波联合作用下的非线性动力响应分析

林仁¹, 陈俊岭¹, 冯又全²

作者信息 +

NONLINEAR DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF OFFSHORE WIND TURBINESTRUCTURE UNDER COMBINED WIND-WAVE ACTION

Lin Ren¹, Chen Junling¹, Feng Youquan²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

以IEA-15 MW超大型单桩式风电机组为研究对象,基于几何精确梁理论的混合形式,建立包含叶片-机舱-塔架-基础的一体化非线性模型,探究其在风波联合作用下的动力特性。通过与开源软件OpenFAST计算结果的比较,验证所提出的一体化模型的准确性。结果表明,塔顶的位移响应受环境因素与运行状态的共同作用;气动荷载在结构的动力响应中占主导作用;由于波浪荷载与风荷载存在相位差,波浪对结构的动力响应可能有一定的抑制作用;塔顶处的加速度响应主要受其塔架一阶振型的影响,而塔架最大加速度响应出现在0.8倍塔架高度处,二阶振型对结构振动的影响也不能忽略。

Abstract

Taking one IEA-15 MW monopile wind turbine as an example, an integrated nonlinear model that considers blade-nacelle-tower-foundation interaction is established to investigate its dynamic characteristics under the combined actions of wind and waves based on the hybrid form of geometrically exact beam theory. The accuracy of the proposed numerical model is validated by comparing its calculation results with those of the open-source software OpenFAST. The results show that the displacement response at the top of the tower is affected by the combined effect of environmental conditions and the operating conditions. The aerodynamic loads play a dominant role in the dynamic response of the tower. The wave may have a certain inhibitory effect on the structural dynamic response due to the phase difference between the wind and wave loads. The acceleration response at the tower top is mainly influenced by the first vibration mode of the tower and the maximum acceleration response of the tower occurs at 0.8 times the tower height. The influence of the second-order vibration mode on the structural vibration cannot be ignored.

导出引用

林仁, 陈俊岭, 冯又全. 大型海上风电机组结构在风波联合作用下的非线性动力响应分析[J]. 太阳能学报. 2026, 47(1): 424-431 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1474

Lin Ren, Chen Junling, Feng Youquan. NONLINEAR DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF OFFSHORE WIND TURBINESTRUCTURE UNDER COMBINED WIND-WAVE ACTION[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica. 2026, 47(1): 424-431 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1474

中图分类号： TU391

参考文献

[1] 李志昊, 岳敏楠, 闫阳天, 等. 不同海况下近海超大型风力机动力学响应及结构损伤分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(7): 366-374.LI Z H, YUE M N, YAN Y T, et al. Analysis of dynamic response and structural damage of offshore super large wind turbine under different sea conditions[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2022, 43(7): 366-374.
[2] 余玮, 柯世堂. 大型风力机塔架-叶片体系风振与地震作用对比研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2017, 38(8): 2117-2125.YU W, KE S T. Comparsion research of wind effect and seismic action for tower-blade system of large scale wind turbine[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2017, 38(8): 2117-2125.
[3] 柯世堂, 余玮, 王同光. 基于大涡模拟考虑叶片停机位置大型风力机风振响应分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(7): 92-98.KE S T, YU W, WANG T G. Wind-included vibration response analysis for a large wind turbine blade-tower systembased on large eddy simulation[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2017, 36(7): 92-98.
[4] FAN J, LI Q, ZHANG Y P.Collapse analysis of wind turbine tower under the coupled effects of wind and near-field earthquake[J]. Wind energy, 2019, 22(3): 407-419.
[5] 戴靠山, 赵志, 毛振西. 风力发电塔筒极端动力荷载作用下破坏的对比研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(15): 252-257, 272.DAI K S, ZHAO Z, MAO Z X. Failure of a wind turbine tower under extreme dynamic loads[J]. Journal of vibration and shock, 2019, 38(15): 252-257.
[6] 叶柯华, 李春, 丁勤卫, 等. 大型风力机多体动力学仿真下结构动态响应[J]. 太阳能学报, 2018, 39(5): 1459-1466.YE K H, LI C, DING Q W, et al. Dynamic response of structure of large-scale wind turbine using multibody dynamic simulation[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2018, 39(5): 1459-1466.
[7] QUILLIGAN A, O’CONNOR A, PAKRASHI V. Fragility analysis of steel and concrete wind turbine towers[J]. Engineering structures, 2012, 36: 270-282.
[8] DNV GL.Bladed theory manual [R]. Garrad Hassan & Partners Ltd, 2020.
[9] JONKMAN J M, BUHL JR M L. FAST user’s guide [R]. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2005, 365: 366.
[10] 陈俊岭, 赵邦州, 阳荣昌. 基于FAST的风电机组塔架耦合振动研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(10): 353-361.CHEN J L, ZHAO B Z, YANG R C. Research on coupling vibration of wind turbine tower based on FAST[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2023, 44(10): 353-361.
[11] MANOLAS D I, RIZIOTIS V A, VOUTSINAS S G.Assessing the importance of geometric nonlinear effects in the prediction of wind turbine blade loads[J]. Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics, 2015, 10(4): 041008.
[12] GAERTNER E, RINKER J, SETHURAMAN L, et al.Definition of the IEA 15-Megawatt offshore reference wind turbine[R]. National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL), Golden, CO(United States), 2020.
[13] 段秀敏, 赵峻彦. 欧拉方向余弦矩阵在机构学中的应用[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2007, 23(5): 29-32.DUAN X M, ZHAO J Y. Euler orientation cosine matrix and its applicat ion in mechanical engineering[J]. Machine design and research, 2007, 5: 29-32.
[14] 周绍磊, 丛源材, 李娟, 等. 方向余弦矩阵中四元数提取算法比较[J]. 中国惯性技术学报, 2008, 16(4): 415-418.ZHOU S L, CONG Y C, LI J, et al. Comparison of algorithms for extracting quaternion from DCM[J]. Journal of Chinese inertial technology, 2008, 16(4): 415-418.
[15] WANG Q, YU W B.Geometrically nonlinear analysis of composite beams using Wiener-Milenković parameters[J]. Journal of renewable and sustainable energy, 2017, 9(3): 033306.
[16] YU W B, BLAIR M.GEBT: a general-purpose nonlinear analysis tool for composite beams[J]. Composite structures, 2012, 94(9): 2677-2689.
[17] IEC 61400-3, Design requirements for offshore wind turbines[S].
[18] FALTINSEN O M, ODD M.Sea loads on ships and offshore structures [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[19] IEC 61400-1, Design requirements for wind turbines[S].
[20] SNEL H, SCHEPERS J.Joint investigation of dynamic inflow effects and implementation of an engineering method [R]. Petten: Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands, 1995.
[21] BRANLARD E.Wind turbine aerodynamics and vorticity-based methods: fundamentals and recent applications[M]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017.
[22] ZUO H R, BI K M, HAO H.Dynamic analyses of operating offshore wind turbines including soil-structure interaction[J]. Engineering structures, 2018, 157: 42-62.