非均匀半透明光伏窗眩光指标适用性研究

杨璐; 彭晋卿; 谭羽桐

doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-2007

PDF(2157 KB)

太阳能学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3) : 713-721. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-2007

非均匀半透明光伏窗眩光指标适用性研究

杨璐, 彭晋卿, 谭羽桐

作者信息 +

STUDY ON APPLICABILITY OF GLARE INDICES FOR INHOMOGENEOUS SEMI-TRANSPARENT PHOTOVOLTAIC WINDOWS

Yang Lu, Peng Jinqing, Tan Yutong

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

探究常用眩光指标对非均匀半透明光伏窗日光眩光评估的适用性。首先,设计眩光感知问卷并招募38名受试者以获取其在电池条纹宽度为4 mm、电池覆盖率分别为40%和60%条件下的实际眩光感知程度。同时,使用相机和照度计开展实验测试以获取垂直眼部照度、光源亮度和天然光眩光概率（DGP）等光环境指标。对比基于图像的眩光指标与问卷调查结果,分析其与现有眩光指标的相关性以及太阳电池覆盖率对DGP指标适用性的影响。研究结果表明：在现有眩光指标中,DGP与实际感知眩光的平方相关系数最高,但DGP往往会低估非均匀半透明光伏窗的眩光。当太阳电池覆盖率从40%增至60%时,采用DGP指标评估非均匀半透明光伏窗眩光性能的准确性降低6.79%。

Abstract

This study pioneers the investigation into the applicability of conventional glare indices for assessing daylight glare from inhomogeneous STPV windows. A glare perception survey was designed, involving 38 participants to capture their subjective glare perception under conditions with cell strip widths of 4 mm and cell coverage ratios of 40% and 60%. Simultaneously, experiments were conducted using cameras and illuminance meters to measure key lighting environment parameters, such as vertical eye illuminance and DGP. The correlation between image-based glare indices and the survey results was analyzed to assess the relevance of existing indices and determine the influence of cell coverage ratios on the applicability of DGP. The findings reveal that DGP demonstrates the highest coefficient of determination with perceived glare, indicating it is the most relevant index. However, DGP tends to underestimate glare caused by inhomogeneous STPV windows. Furthermore, when the cell coverage ratio increased from 40% to 60%, the accuracy of glare evaluation using DGP decreased by 6.79%.

导出引用

杨璐, 彭晋卿, 谭羽桐. 非均匀半透明光伏窗眩光指标适用性研究[J]. 太阳能学报. 2026, 47(3): 713-721 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-2007

Yang Lu, Peng Jinqing, Tan Yutong. STUDY ON APPLICABILITY OF GLARE INDICES FOR INHOMOGENEOUS SEMI-TRANSPARENT PHOTOVOLTAIC WINDOWS[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica. 2026, 47(3): 713-721 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-2007

中图分类号： TU113.5

参考文献

[1] 王春磊, 彭晋卿, 李念平, 等. 不同透过率下非晶硅光伏窗综合能效性能研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2019, 40(6): 1607-1615.
WANG C L, PENG J Q, LI N P, et al.Study of overall energy performance of amorphous silicon photovoltaic window based on variable transmittances[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2019, 40(6): 1607-1615.
[2] WANG M, PENG J Q, LI N P, et al.Comparison of energy performance between PV double skin facades and PV insulating glass units[J]. Applied energy, 2017, 194: 148-160.
[3] CONSTANTINOU S, AL-NAEMI F, ALRASHIDI H, et al.A review on technological and urban sustainability perspectives of advanced building-integrated photovoltaics[J]. Energy science & engineering, 2024, 12(3): 1265-1293.
[4] PANAGIOTIDOU M, BRITO M C, HAMZA K, et al.Prospects of photovoltaic rooftops, walls and windows at a city to building scale[J]. Solar energy, 2021, 230: 675-687.
[5] KONSTANTZOS I, SADEGHI S A, KIM M, et al.The effect of lighting environment on task performance in buildings:a review[J]. Energy and buildings, 2020, 226: 110394.
[6] 李安喆, 侯宏娟, 王锡, 等. 光伏组件布置方式对光伏温室温光环境的影响研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(9): 285-294.
LI A Z, HOU H J, WANG X, et al.Research on effect of photovoltaic module arrangement on temperature and light environment of photovoltaic greenhouse[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2024, 45(9): 285-294.
[7] KNOOP M, STEFANI O, BUENO B, et al.Daylight: what makes the difference?[J]. Lighting research & technology, 2020, 52(3): 423-442.
[8] GB/Z 26211—2010, 室内工作环境的不舒适眩光[S].
GB/Z 26211—2010, Discomfort glare in the interior working environment[S].
[9] LUO Z Y, QI X N, SUN C, et al.Investigation of influential variations among variables in daylighting glare metrics using machine learning and SHAP[J]. Building and environment, 2024, 254: 111394.
[10] GILLIAN I, VERONICA G H, MICHAEL H.Evaluation of the luminous environment in open-plan offices with skylights[C]//The World Renewable Energy Forum 2012. Denver, Colorado, USA, 2012: 1-8.
[11] KAPSIS K, DERMARDIROS V, ATHIENITIS A K.Daylight performance of perimeter office façades utilizing semi-transparent photovoltaic windows: a simulation study[J]. Energy procedia, 2015, 78: 334-339.
[12] WANG W T, YANG H X, XIANG C Y.The overall performance of a novel semi-transparent photovoltaic window with passive radiative cooling coating-A comparative study[J]. Energy and buildings, 2024, 317: 114433.
[13] TAN Y T, PENG J Q, WANG M, et al.Comfort assessment and energy performance analysis of a novel adjustable semi-transparent photovoltaic window under different rule-based controls[J]. Building simulation, 2023, 16(12): 2343-2361.
[14] LI S X, LIAO C Y.The Researches on Daylighting of Photovoltaic Building[C]//Conference Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Project Management. Beijing, China, 2020: 439-445.
[15] LIU D M, SUN Y Y, WILSON R, et al.Comprehensive evaluation of window-integrated semi-transparent PV for building daylight performance[J]. Renewable energy, 2020, 145: 1399-1411.
[16] PENG J Q, CURCIJA D C, THANACHAREONKIT A, et al.Comparative study on the overall energy performance between photovoltaic and Low-E insulated glass units[J]. Solar energy, 2021, 214: 443-456.
[17] 徐剑, 向泽锐, 支锦亦, 等. 光环境视觉舒适性测评方法综述[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 34(11): 190-198.
XU J, XIANG Z R, ZHI J Y, et al.Review on measurement and evaluation methods of visual comfort in lighting environment[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (natural science), 2020, 34(11): 190-198.
[18] SMOLDERS K C H J, DE KORT Y A W. Bright light and mental fatigue: effects on alertness, vitality, performance and physiological arousal[J]. Journal of environmental psychology, 2014, 39: 77-91.
[19] 金玲, 薛鹏, 石佳欣, 等. 小学教室天然采光与人工照明的融合调查研究[J]. 建筑科学, 2024, 40(6): 251-263.
JIN L, XUE P, SHI J X, et al.A field investigation of integrated daylighting and artificial lighting in primary school classrooms[J]. Building science, 2024, 40(6): 251-263.
[20] 高静, 彭晋卿, 王韬宁, 等. 不同电池宽度半透明光伏窗天然采光分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(3): 223-230.
GAO J, PENG J Q, WANG T N, et al.Daylighting analysis of semi-transparent photovoltaic windows with different cell widths[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2022, 43(3): 223-230.
[21] 白本督, 刘军, 范九伦. 高动态范围成像研究进展[J]. 西安邮电大学学报, 2016, 21(3): 1-14.
BAI B D, LIU J, FAN J L.Recent research in high dynamic range imaging[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2016, 21(3): 1-14.
[22] PIERSON C, CAUWERTS C, BODART M, et al.Tutorial: luminance maps for daylighting studies from high dynamic range photography[J]. LEUKOS, 2021, 17(2): 140-169.
[23] PIERSON C, WIENOLD J, BODART M.Daylight discomfort glare evaluation with evalglare: influence of parameters and methods on the accuracy of discomfort glare prediction[J]. Buildings, 2018, 8(8): 94.
[24] WIENOLD J, IWATA T, SAREY KHANIE M, et al.Cross-validation and robustness of daylight glare metrics[J]. Lighting research & technology, 2019, 51(7): 983-1013.
[25] WIENOLD J, CHRISTOFFERSEN J.Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras[J]. Energy and buildings, 2006, 38(7): 743-757.
[26] KRASKA M M.Nonparametric statistics for social and behavioral sciences[M]. Alabama: Crc Press, 2013: 87-93.