该文将当前主流高干舷海上光伏设计归为4种典型的浮筒桁架组合形式,并展开综合性能对比分析。基于OrcaFlex平台建立时域水动力分析模型,并在Matlab中建立考虑运动影响的动态功率评估模型。然后,通过水池模型试验和光伏标准测试结果,验证所建模型的有效性。最后,分别对比静水、规则波以及非规则波下4类典型结构的综合性能。研究结果表明竖直浮筒与半浸没水平浮筒的组合形式综合表现更佳,在保证正气隙的同时具有较小的系泊力,且参数分析表明增加水平浮筒直径能显著改善气隙表现。
Abstract
This paper classifies current high-freeboard OFPV (Offshore Floating Photovoltaic) designs as four typical pontoon-truss structures, followed by a comprehensive performance analysis. Firstly, a time-domain hydrodynamic model was established in OrcaFlex, and a dynamic power prediction model incorporating motion effects was developed using MATLAB. These models were then validated against model experiments and standard test results. Subsequently, the comprehensive performance of the four structure types was compared under static water, regular wave, and irregular wave conditions. The results demonstrate that the structure combining vertical pontoons with semi-submerged horizontal pontoons delivers superior performance, achieving a positive air gap while maintaining lower mooring forces. Parametric analysis further indicates that increasing the diameter of the horizontal pontoons significantly improves air gap performance.
关键词
光伏发电 /
浮式结构 /
动力响应 /
数值分析 /
对比分析 /
系泊
Key words
photovoltaic power generation /
floating structure /
dynamic response /
numerical analysis /
comparative analysis /
mooring
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Shi W, Yan C J, Ren Z R, et al.Review on the development of marine floating photovoltaic systems[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 286: 115560.
[2] 宋肖锋, 陈作钢, 肖福勤, 等. 漂浮式光伏电站方阵风载荷数值研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2020, 41(10): 136-143.
Song X F, Chen Z G, Xiao F Q, et al.Numerical research on wind load of floating solar power plants[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2020, 41(10): 136-143.
[3] 徐普, 黎思亮, 宋启明, 等. 深水漂浮式光伏平台系泊结构动力响应分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(10): 156-164.
Xu P, Li S L, Song Q M, et al.Dynamic response analysis of mooring structure for deep-water floating photovoltaic platform[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2023, 44(10): 156-164.
[4] 施兴华, 孙哲, 张婧. 考虑连接件刚度影响的多浮体漂浮光伏方阵运动响应分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(8): 301-306.
Shi X H, Sun Z, Zhang J.Kinematic response analysis of multi-body floating photovoltaic array considering stiffness of connecting parts[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2023, 44(8): 301-306.
[5] 陈魁啸, 赵树杰, 张鹏, 等. 随机波浪作用下漂浮式光伏阵列发电性能仿真分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(9): 317-325.
Chen K X, Zhao S J, Zhang P, et al.Numerical simulation of power generation performance of floating photovoltaic arrays under random wave environment[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2024, 45(9): 317-325.
[6] 孔祥玉, 邵阳苹, 付强, 等. 海上漂浮式光伏多浮体间电缆跨接方法研究[J]. 工程科学学报, 2025, 47(2): 389-400.
Kong X Y, Shao Y P, Fu Q, et al.Study on a cable jumper method for offshore floating photovoltaic systems with multiple floating bodies[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2025, 47(2): 389-400.
[7] 王霄, 王树青, 宋宪仓, 等. 海上漂浮式光伏平台研究进展与关键技术[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2026, 58(1): 289-302.
Wang X, Wang S Q, Song X C, et al.A review of research progress and key issues of offshore floating photovoltaic platforms[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2026, 58(1): 289-302.
[8] Luo W P, Zhang X T, TIAN X L, et al.Conceptual design and model test of a pontoon-truss type offshore floating photovoltaic system with soft connection[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 309: 118518.
[9] Widnall S.Lecture l3-vectors, matrices and coordinate transformations[M]. Dynamics, 2009: 1-15.
[10] Masters G M.Renewable and efficient electric power systems[M]. Wiley, 2004.
[11] Kumar M, Kumar A.An efficient parameters extraction technique of photovoltaic models for performance assessment[J]. Solar Energy, 2017, 158: 192-206.
[12] Bai J B, Liu S, Hao Y Z, et al.Development of a new compound method to extract the five parameters of PV modules[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 79: 294-303.
[13] Bi C, Law A W.Co-locating offshore wind and floating solar farms-effect of high wind and wave conditions on solar power performance[J]. Energy, 2023, 266: 126437.
基金
国家自然科学基金(42476226; 42461144208); 海南省教育厅三亚崖州湾科技城博士研究生科研创新基金联合项目(HSPHDSRF-2024-01-005)