COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF WIND POWER AND PHOTOVOLTAIC DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT TOPSIS MODEL

Yang Chun

doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-0661

PDF(1444 KB)

Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12) : 70-78. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-0661

COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF WIND POWER AND PHOTOVOLTAIC DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT TOPSIS MODEL

Yang Chun

Author information +

History +

Abstract

At present, China’s new energy（especially wind power and photovoltaic） development is lack of macro guidance and long-term planning phenomenon. How to accurately assess the development potential of wind power and photovoltaic in various regions of our country, so as to scientifically guide the healthy and orderly development of new enegery is an urgent problem to be solved. To this end, a wind power and photovoltaic development potential evaluation model based on entropy weight TOPSIS is proposed. Firstly, considering the characteristics and main contradictions of China’s wind power and photovoltaic development, a wind power and photovoltaic development potential evaluation index system was constructed. And a wind power and photovoltaic development potential evaluation model based on the entropy method TOPSIS was proposed;In the second place, the article use the model to evaluate and analyze the development potential of wind power and photovoltaic in 31 regions of China; Finally, based on the evaluation results of various regions and the characteristics of wind power and photovoltaic development, specific development suggestions are put forward.

Key words

wind power / PV power / power management / energy policy / entropy TOPSIS method / development proposals

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Yang Chun. COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF WIND POWER AND PHOTOVOLTAIC DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT TOPSIS MODEL[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica. 2022, 43(12): 70-78 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2021-0661

References

[1] 国家能源局. 推动能源清洁低碳安全高效利用[EB/OL].http://www.nea.gov.cn/2021-01/15/c_139669173.htm.
[2] 国家能源局. 国新办举行中国可再生能源发展有关情况发布会[EB/OL]. http://www.nea.gov.cn/2021-03/30/c_139846095.htm
[3] 周兴波, 杜效鹄. 2018年全球水电发展现状与开发潜力分析[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2019, 39(3): 18-23, 94.
ZHOU X B, DU X H.Analysis of global hydropower development status and development potential in 2018[J]. Advances in science and technology of water resources and hydropower, 2019, 39(3): 18-23, 94.
[4] 李虹, 董亮, 段红霞. 中国可再生能源发展综合评价与结构优化研究[J]. 资源科学, 2011, 33(3): 431-440.
LI H, DONG L, DUAN H X.Research on comprehensive evaluation and structural optimization of China’s renewable energy development[J]. Resources science, 2011, 33(3): 431-440.
[5] 余顺坤, 毕平平, 杨文茵, 等. 基于配额制的可再生能源动态发展系统动力学研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38(9): 2599-2608, 2828.
YU S K, BI P P, YANG W Y, et al.Research on dynamics of renewable energy development system based on quota system[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2018, 38(9): 2599-2608, 2828.
[6] 刘贞, 张希良, 高虎. 可再生能源发展情景设计及评价研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(7): 28-32.
LIU Z, ZHANG X L, GAO H.Research on scenario design and evaluation of renewable energy development[J]. China population·resources and environment, 2011, 21(7): 28-32.
[7] 蔡立亚, 郭剑锋, 姬强. 基于G8与BRIC的新能源及可再生能源发电绩效动态评价[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(2): 250-260.
CAI L Y, GUO J F, JI Q.Dynamic evaluation of new energy and renewable energy power generation performance based on G8 and BRIC[J]. Resources science, 2013, 35(2): 250-260.
[8] 章玲, 何乐, 王璐盼, 等. 基于VI~2OWA的多指标评价方法及其在新能源中的应用[J]. 系统工程, 2017, 35(4): 122-129.
ZHANG L, HE L, WANG L P, et al.Multi-index evaluation method based on VI~2OWA and its application in new energy[J]. Systems engineering, 2017, 35(4): 122-129.
[9] 王磊. 新能源产业发展能力评价研究——以天津市为例[J]. 生态经济, 2013(5): 105-108.
WANG L.Research on evaluation of new energy industry development ability—take Tianjin as an example[J]. Ecological economy, 2013(5): 105-108.
[10] 孟浩, 陈颖健. 基于层次分析法的新能源产业发展能力综合评价[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2010(6): 51-58.
MENG H, CHEN Y J.Comprehensive evaluation of new energy industry development ability based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Forum on science and technology in China, 2010(6): 51-58.
[11] 王波. 我国城市发展新能源的评价指标体系和案例应用研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2013.
WANG B.Research on the evaluation index system and case application of new energy in urban development in my country[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2013.
[12] 方嵩, 彭嵩, 赵晋泉, 等. DG启动及运行特性综合评价指标与方法[J]. 电测与仪表, 2019, 56(14): 5-11.
FANG S, PENG S, ZHAO J Q, et al.Comprehensive evaluation index and method of DG start-up and operation characteristics[J]. Electrical measurement & instrumentation, 2019, 56(14): 5-11.
[13] 李雪. 区域战略性新兴产业发展潜力动态评价[D]. 南昌: 华东交通大学, 2019.
LI X.Dynamic evaluation of the development potential of regional strategic emerging industries[D]. Nanchang: East China Jiaotong University, 2019.
[14] 国家发改委. 关于开展“十二五”单位国内生产总值二氧化碳排放降低目标责任考核评估的通知[EB/OL].https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/201605/t20160525_963072.html.
[15] 汪朋, 方匡南, 张庆昭. 新能源与区域电网协调发展的综合评价研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2020, 35(2): 121-128.
WANG P, FANG K N, ZHANG Q Z.Comprehensive evaluation research on the coordinated development of new energy and regional power grid[J]. Statistics and information forum, 2020, 35(2): 121-128.
[16] 傅聪颖, 赖昭豪, 郭熙. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的区域资源环境承载力评价及障碍因素诊断[J]. 生态经济, 2020, 36(1): 198-204.
FU C Y, LAI Z H, GUO X.Evaluation of regional resource and environmental carrying capacity and diagnosis of obstacle factors based on entropy weight TOPSIS model[J]. Ecological economy, 2020, 36(1): 198-204.
[17] 吴昊, 朱自伟. 基于熵权-层次分析法综合指标的电网关键节点辨识[J]. 电测与仪表, 2020, 57(24): 93-100.
WU H, ZHU Z W.Identification of key nodes in power grid based on comprehensive index of entropy weight and analytic hierarchy process[J]. Electrical measurement & instrumentation, 2020, 57(24): 93-100.
[18] 谢敬东, 陆池鑫, 鲁思薇. 基于序关系-熵权法的电力市场风险评估[J]. 中国电力, 2021, 54(6): 71-78.
XIE J D, LU C X, LU S W.Electricity market risk assessment based on order relationship-entropy weight method[J]. China power, 2021, 54(6): 71-78.
[19] 信桂新, 杨朝现, 杨庆媛, 等. 用熵权法和改进TOPSIS模型评价高标准基本农田建设后效应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(1): 238-249.
XIN G X, YANG C X, YANG Q Y, et al.Evaluation of post-effects of high-standard basic farmland construction with entropy weight method and improved TOPSIS model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(1): 238-249.