Addressing the variability of safety distance calculations in national standards for different fields quantitative risk analysis （QRA） was carried out on a typical hydrogen fuelling station configuration model, and the safety distance and personal risk between the hydrogen fuelling station facilities and the protection targets outside the station were calculated. The cross-validation of standards in many fields （hydrogen energy field and hazardous chemicals field） was realized, and the adaptability difference between hydrogen energy standards and hazardous chemicals standards in hydrogen fuelling stations was revealed, which provided a multi-dimensional reference for the design, construction and risk control of hydrogen fuelling stations.
Key words
hydrogen /
safety /
hydrogenation /
quantitative risk assessment /
multi-standard crossanalysis
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] HAM K, MARANGON A, MIDDHA P, et al.Benchmark exercise on risk assessment methods applied to a virtual hydrogen refuelling station[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2011, 36(3): 2666-2677.
[2] SUZUKI T, SHIOTA K, IZATO Y I, et al.Quantitative risk assessment using a Japanese hydrogen refueling station model[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2021, 46(11): 8329-8343.
[3] KWON D, CHOI S K, YU C.Improved safety by crossanalyzing quantitative risk assessment of hydrogen refueling stations[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2022, 47(19): 10788-10798.
[4] GB 50516—2010, 加氢站技术规范[S].
GB 50516—2010, Technical code for bydrogen fuelling station[S].
[5] GB 36894—2018, 危险化学品生产装置和储存设施风险基准[S].
GB 36894—2018, Risk criteria for hazardous chemicals production unit and storage installations[S].
[6] GB 37243—2019, 危险化学品生产装置和储存设施外部安全防护距离确定方法[S].
GB 37243—2019, Method for determining the external safety protection distance of hazardous chemical production and storage facilities[S].
[7] GROTH K M, HECHT E S.HyRAM: a methodology and toolkit for quantitative risk assessment of hydrogen systems[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2017, 42(11): 7485-7493.
[8] EHRHART B, HECHT E.Hydrogen plus other alternative fuels risk assessment models(HyRAM+) version 4.1 technical reference manual[R]. Sandia national lab.(SNL-NM), albuquerque, NM (United States); sandia national laboratories, SNL california, 2022.
[9] TORVI D A, HADJISOPHOCLEOUS G V, HUM J.A new method for estimating the effects of thermal radiation from fires on building occupants[C]//Proceedings of ASME 2000 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2021: 65-72.
PDF(1930 KB)
