RISK ANALYSIS OF HIGH-PRESSURE HYDROGEN STORAGE BOTTLE GROUP OF LIQUID HYDROGEN REFUELING STATION BASED ON FMEA

Zhang Shouhua; Wang Haixiang; Li Jiepu; Yang Hong; Han Wulin; Li Xiang

doi:10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1753

PDF(1118 KB)

Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2) : 754-760. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1753

RISK ANALYSIS OF HIGH-PRESSURE HYDROGEN STORAGE BOTTLE GROUP OF LIQUID HYDROGEN REFUELING STATION BASED ON FMEA

Zhang Shouhua^1,2, Wang Haixiang³, Li Jiepu¹, Yang Hong², Han Wulin⁴, Li Xiang¹

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The failure mode and effects analysis （FMEA） method is used to identify and analyze the potential accident scenarios of the high-pressure hydrogen storage cylinder group of the liquid hydrogen refueling station, and the qualitative risk assessment of these accident scenarios is carried out in the form of a risk matrix. In addition, the risk matrix results for the high-pressure hydrogen storage cylinder group of the liquid hydrogen refueling station with and without safety measures are compared, and the results show that the proposed safety measures can reduce the risk level of the high-pressure hydrogen storage cylinder group to a tolerable level.

Key words

liquid hydrogen / hydrogen refueling station / risk assessment / hydrogen storage / gas cylinders / failure mode and effect analysis

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Zhang Shouhua, Wang Haixiang, Li Jiepu, Yang Hong, Han Wulin, Li Xiang. RISK ANALYSIS OF HIGH-PRESSURE HYDROGEN STORAGE BOTTLE GROUP OF LIQUID HYDROGEN REFUELING STATION BASED ON FMEA[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica. 2026, 47(2): 754-760 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-1753

References

[1] CHEN J Y, GAO X X, SHAO S Q, et al.Numerical investigation of the vortex tube performance in novel precooling methods in the hydrogen fueling station[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2021, 46(7): 5548-5555.
[2] 刘峻, 赵汪, 高学强, 等. 全球加氢站产业、技术及标准进展综述[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(6): 362-372.
LIU J, ZHAO W, GAO X Q, et al.Review on advances in industry, technology, and standard of global hydrogen refuelling stations[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2022, 43(6): 362-372.
[3] 王鑫, 陈叔平, 朱鸣. 液氢储运技术发展现状与展望[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(1): 500-514.
WANG X, CHEN S P, ZHU M.Development status and prospect of liquid hydrogen storage and transportation technology[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2024, 45(1): 500-514.
[4] 扬帆, 张超, 张博超, 等. 大型液氢储罐内罐材料研究与应用进展[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(10): 557-563.
YANG F, ZHANG C, ZHANG B C, et al.Research and application progress of inner tank materials for large liquid hydrogen storage tanks[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2023, 44(10): 557-563.
[5] DUAN Z X, SHI K.Review and problem analysis on the development of hydrogen fueling stations in China[C]//Volume 1: Codes and Standards. Virtual, Online, 2021: V001T01A051.
[6] 薛明喆, 师存阳, 刘家宁, 等. 液氢加氢站及其关键装备的发展现状及展望[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 51(12): 1959-1971.
XUE M Z, SHI C Y, LIU J N, et al.Development status and prospects of liquid hydrogen refueling station and its key equipment[J]. Journal of Tongji University (natural science), 2023, 51(12): 1959-1971.
[7] WANG X Y, GAO W.Hydrogen leakage risk assessment for hydrogen refueling stations[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2023, 48(91): 35795-35808.
[8] 李静媛, 赵永志, 郑津洋. 加氢站高压氢气泄漏爆炸事故模拟及分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(7): 1389-1394.
LI J Y, ZHAO Y Z, ZHENG J Y.Simulation and analysis on leakage and explosion of high pressure hydrogen in hydrogen refueling station[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (engineering science), 2015, 49(7): 1389-1394.
[9] YANG F Y, WANG T Z, DENG X T, et al.Review on hydrogen safety issues: incident statistics, hydrogen diffusion, and detonation process[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2021, 46(61): 31467-31488.
[10] KWAK J, LEE H, PARK S, et al.Risk assessment of a hydrogen refueling station in an urban area[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(9): 3963.
[11] PARK B, KIM Y, PAIK S, et al.Numerical and experimental analysis of jet release and jet flame length for qualitative risk analysis at hydrogen refueling station[J]. Process safety and environmental protection, 2021, 155: 145-154.
[12] 郑津洋, 刘自亮, 花争立, 等. 氢安全研究现状及面临的挑战[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(1): 106-115.
ZHENG J Y, LIU Z L, HUA Z L, et al.Research status-in-situ and key challenges in hydrogen safety[J]. Journal of safety and environment, 2020, 20(1): 106-115.
[13] 王景云. 船舶电气系统的可靠性分析与评估[J]. 船舶物资与市场, 2024, 32(5): 77-79.
WANG J Y.Reliability analysis and evaluation of ship electrical system[J]. Marine equipment/materials & marketing, 2024, 32(5): 77-79.
[14] 袁瑗, 郭欢, 封春春, 等. 基于FMEA的反应釜故障诊断研究[J]. 化学工程师, 2020, 34(6): 71-74, 61.
YUAN Y, GUO H, FENG C C, et al.Research on fault diagnosis of reactor based on FMEA[J]. Chemical engineer, 2020, 34(6): 71-74, 61.
[15] HUANG J, YOU J X, LIU H C, et al.Failure mode and effect analysis improvement: a systematic literature review and future research agenda[J]. Reliability engineering & system safety, 2020, 199: 106885.
[16] 中国船级社. 故障模式与影响分析应用指南[EB/OL].https://www.ccs.org.cn/ccswz/specialDetail id=201900001000008027.
[17] China Classification Society.Application guide for failure mode and effects analysis[EB/OL]. https://www.ccs.org.cn/ccswz/specialDetail id=201900001000008027.