SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF FLOATING WIND TURBINE SUCTION BUCKET FOUNDATION CONSIDERING SCOUR

Su Yuming, Cheng Xinglei, Zhang Jianxin, Liu Ju, Wang Mingyuan

Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3) : 384-391.

PDF(2859 KB)
Welcome to visit Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, Today is
PDF(2859 KB)
Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3) : 384-391. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-2008

SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF FLOATING WIND TURBINE SUCTION BUCKET FOUNDATION CONSIDERING SCOUR

  • Su Yuming1, Cheng Xinglei1, Zhang Jianxin1, Liu Ju1, Wang Mingyuan2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

This study leverages the FLAC 3D finite difference software platform and utilizes the SANISAND constitutive model to simulate the stress-strain behavior of sand soil. It systematically investigates the dynamic behavior of suction bucket foundations under the combined action of vertical tensile loads and seismic loads in the context of local scour conditions. The findings reveal that seismic actions can induce cumulative vertical displacement in suction buckets subjected to vertical tensile loads, potentially leading to foundation failure due to excessive displacement. Scour exacerbates this issue by increasing the depth of liquefied sand under seismic loading, reducing the bucket-soil frictional resistance, and diminishing the uplift capacity of the suction bucket, thereby further compromising the foundation's integrity. Additionally, the degree of liquefaction in the surrounding sand decreases with decreasing distance from the outer wall of the suction bucket in the horizontal direction. Notably, the cumulative pore pressure inside the suction bucket is significantly lower than that outside, indicating that the presence of the suction bucket exerts a substantial inhibitory effect on the liquefaction of the surrounding sand.

Key words

offshore wind power / liquefaction / scour / suction bucket foundation / earthquake loads / tensile load

Cite this article

Download Citations
Su Yuming, Cheng Xinglei, Zhang Jianxin, Liu Ju, Wang Mingyuan. SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF FLOATING WIND TURBINE SUCTION BUCKET FOUNDATION CONSIDERING SCOUR[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica. 2026, 47(3): 384-391 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2024-2008

References

[1] WANG X X, YANG Q, TANG X W.Responses of suction buckets subjected to sustained vertical uplift loads in sand[J]. Marine georesources & geotechnology, 2022, 40(1): 36-51.
[2] WANG X F, ZENG X W, LI J L.Vertical performance of suction bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines in sand[J]. Ocean engineering, 2019, 180: 40-48.
[3] MANA D S K, GOURVENEC S, RANDOLPH M F. Experimental investigation of reverse end bearing of offshore shallow foundations[J]. Canadian geotechnical journal, 2013, 50(10): 1022-1033.
[4] KEAWSAWASVONG S, UKRITCHON B.Finite element limit analysis of pullout capacity of planar caissons in clay[J]. Computers and geotechnics, 2016, 75: 12-17.
[5] UKRITCHON B, KEAWSAWASVONG S.Undrained pullout capacity of cylindrical suction caissons by finite element limit analysis[J]. Computers and geotechnics, 2016, 80: 301-311.
[6] NIELSEN S D.Finite element modeling of the tensile capacity of suction caissons in cohesionless soil[J]. Applied ocean research, 2019, 90: 101866.
[7] UKRITCHON B, WONGTOYTHONG P, KEAWSAWA SVONG S.New design equation for undrained pullout capacity of suction caissons considering combined effects of caisson aspect ratio, adhesion factor at interface, and linearly increasing strength[J]. Applied ocean research, 2018, 75: 1-14.
[8] MANA D S K, GOURVENEC S M, RANDOLPH M F, et al. Failure mechanisms of skirted foundations in uplift and compression[J]. International journal of physical modelling in geotechnics, 2012, 12(2): 47-62.
[9] LUO J W, LIU X Q, LIU X P, et al.Failure behavior and surrounding soil stress responses of suction anchor in low-strength muddy clay[J]. Journal of marine science and engineering, 2023, 11(11): 21-90.
[10] WHITEHOUSE R. scour at marine structures: a manual for practical applications[M]. London: Thomas Telford Ltd, 1998.
[11] 刘润, 王迎春, 汪嘉钰, 等. 单侧冲刷对海上风电筒型基础稳定性影响研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(1): 73-79.
LIU R, WANG Y C, WANG J Y, et al.Research on effects of unilateral erosion on stability of offshore wind bucket foundation[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2022, 43(1): 73-79.
[12] 黄敏敏, 郑为, 施兴华, 等. 受水流冲刷影响后的吸力桶基础水平极限承载力[J]. 中国海洋平台, 2024, 39(2): 28-33.
HUANG M M, ZHENG W, SHI X H, et al.Horizontal ultimate bearing capacity of suction bucket foundation affected by water scour[J]. China offshore platform, 2024, 39(2): 28-33.
[13] 赵学亮, 隋淑环, 陈馨睿, 等. 砂土中吸力式筒形基础冲刷数值模拟分析[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2023, 44(4): 554-562.
ZHAO X L, SUI S H, CHEN X R, et al.A numerical analysis of scour of suction bucket foundation in sand[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2023, 44(4): 554-562.
[14] 邱旭, 马文冠, 张宇, 等. 海上风电场单桩基础局部冲刷深度计算方法适应性研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(11): 287-293.
QIU X, MA W G, ZHANG Y, et al.Study on adaptability of calculation method for local scouring depth of single pile foundation in offshore wind farms[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2023, 44(11): 287-293.
[15] ESFEH P K, KAYNIA A M.Numerical modeling of liquefaction and its impact on anchor piles for floating offshore structures[J]. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 2019, 127: 105839.
[16] RAMIREZ J, BARRERO A R, CHEN L, et al.Site response in a layered liquefiable deposit: evaluation of different numerical tools and methodologies with centrifuge experimental results[J]. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2018, 144(10): 04018073.
[17] 陈育民, 徐鼎平. FLAC/FLAC3D基础与工程实例[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2013.
CHEN Y M, XU D P.FLAC3D Foundation and engineering examples (2nd edition)[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2013.
[18] STROESCU I E, FRIGAARD P, FEJERSKOV M.Scour development around bucket foundations[J]. International journal of offshore and polar engineering, 2016, 26(1): 57-64.
[19] ZOU X J, CHEN S, YANG Z J, et al.Effects of local scouring on the bearing capacity of monopile-wheel composite foundations in sandy deposit[J]. Ocean engineering, 2023, 288: 116096.
PDF(2859 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/