DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE INVESTIGATION OF COMPOUND HYPERBOLIC CONCENTRATORS

Wu Jian, Zhang Gaoming, Jiang Jiaqi, Xu Zhipeng, Zhou Bin

Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 797-807.

PDF(3268 KB)
Welcome to visit Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, Today is
PDF(3268 KB)
Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 797-807. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2025-0005

DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE INVESTIGATION OF COMPOUND HYPERBOLIC CONCENTRATORS

  • Wu Jian, Zhang Gaoming, Jiang Jiaqi, Xu Zhipeng, Zhou Bin
Author information +
History +

Abstract

To address the issues of high aspect ratio, small acceptance angle and non-uniform irradiance distribution in traditional compound parabolic concentrators (CPCs), a compound hyperbolic concentrator (CHC) was designed by establishing a mathematical model of the geometric profile. The half acceptance angles and aspect ratios of the concentrators were obtained under different geometric concentration ratios. By applying the Monte Carlo ray tracing method, the optical efficiency and irradiance non-uniformity of CPC and CHC were analyzed. The results indicated that under different concentration ratios, the aspect ratio of CHC was always lower than that of CPC, and the half acceptance angle of CHC was always larger than that of CPC. When the concentration ratios were 2 and 4, the aspect ratios of CHC were 1.5 and 5.6 respectively, which were lower than those of CPC at 2.6 and 7.5. The half acceptance angles of CHC were 53.14° and 28° respectively, which were largr than those of CPC at 30° and 14.1°. The optical efficiency of CPC within the acceptance angle range was higher than that of CHC, but CHC possessed a stronger ability for continuous concentration than CPC. When the concentration ratios were 2 and 4, respectively, it was necessary to increase the reflective area of CHC by approximately 20% and 30% along the longitudinal direction to compensate for its lower optical efficiency within the CPC half acceptance angles. However, outside the CPC half acceptance angles, the wider half acceptance angles allowed the CHC to achieve similar concentrating performance to CPC. Additionally, under different incident angles, the maximum irradiance non-uniformity of CHC (0.59 and 0.58) was much lower than that of CPC (6.31 and 12.51), suggesting a more uniform irradiance distribution on the receiving surface. On account of lower aspect ratio, wider acceptance angle and more uniform irradiance, CHC had better potential than CPC in the application of non-tracking low concentrating photovoltaic/thermal systems.

Key words

solar energy / photovoltaic thermal / compound hyperbolic concentrator / aspect ratio / acceptance angle / irradiance non-uniformity

Cite this article

Download Citations
Wu Jian, Zhang Gaoming, Jiang Jiaqi, Xu Zhipeng, Zhou Bin. DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE INVESTIGATION OF COMPOUND HYPERBOLIC CONCENTRATORS[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica. 2026, 47(5): 797-807 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2025-0005

References

[1] 温廷新, 郭晓赛. 基于特征组合的ECA-TCN光伏发电功率预测模型[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(12): 94-100.
WEN T X, GUO X S.ECA-TCN photovoltaic power prediction model based on feature combination[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2024, 45(12): 94-100.
[2] 向宇玥, 褚磊驰, 方元, 等. 基于PV/T的双源热泵热水系统的实验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(10): 171-178.
XIANG Y Y, CHU L C, FANG Y, et al.Experimental study of PV/T-based dual-source heat pump water heater[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2024, 45(10): 171-178.
[3] 陈艺鑫, 陈健斌, 李旭东, 等. 一种轻薄型光伏/光热集热器性能分析及实验研究[J]. 发电技术, 2024, 45(4): 666-674.
CHEN Y X, CHEN J B, LI X D, et al.Performance analysis and experimental study of a kind of thin and light photovoltaic/thermal collector[J]. Power generation technology, 2024, 45(4): 666-674.
[4] 石天庆, 商永强, 刘媛媛, 等. 低倍聚光光伏/光热与地源热泵集成系统综合分析及优化[J]. 热力发电, 2024, 53(7): 45-52.
SHI T Q, SHANG Y Q, LIU Y Y, et al.Comprehensive analysis and operation optimization of a system integrated with ground-source heat pump and solar photovoltaic/thermal component[J]. Thermal power generation, 2024, 53(7): 45-52.
[5] 黄晔, 张高明, 高峰, 等. 双轴跟踪和单轴南北向跟踪CPV/T系统的热电性能研究[J]. 太阳能, 2021(2): 66-73.
HUANG Y, ZHANG G M, GAO F, et al.Study on CPV/T system with dual-axis tracking and south-north single-axis tracking[J]. Solar energy, 2021(2): 66-73.
[6] 颜健, 聂笃忠, 彭佑多, 等. 可改善平面接收器能流均匀性的太阳能碟式聚光器设计[J]. 光学学报, 2020, 40(9): 148-158.
YAN J, NIE D Z, PENG Y D, et al.Design of solar dish concentrator for improving flux uniformity on planar receiver[J]. Acta optica sinica, 2020, 40(9): 148-158.
[7] 金祝岭, 季杰, 徐宁, 等. 一种菲涅尔式高倍聚光光伏光热系统的实验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2018, 39(1): 69-75.
JIN Z L, JI J, XU N, et al.Experimental study of a point-focus fresenel high concentrator photovoltaic/thermal system[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2018, 39(1): 69-75.
[8] 高阳, 魏进家, 谢胡凌, 等. 低倍聚光光伏光热系统热性能分析[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2016, 37(3): 624-628.
GAO Y, WEI J J, XIE H L, et al.Thermal performance analysis for low-concentration photovoltaic thermal system[J]. Journal of engineering thermophysics, 2016, 37(3): 624-628.
[9] 王刚, 陈翔龙, 林建清, 等. 低倍聚光太阳能纳米流体PV/T系统实验研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2024, 45(11): 3233-3238.
WANG G, CHEN X L, LIN J Q, et al.Experimental research on solar nanofluids PV/T system with low solar concentration ratio[J]. Journal of engineering thermophysics, 2024, 45(11): 3233-3238.
[10] 吴小龙, 舒碧芬, 连榕海, 等. V形槽式低倍聚光光伏光热一体化组件性能[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2018, 18(13): 191-199.
WU X L, SHU B F, LIAN R H, et al.The performance of V-shaped trough low-power concentrated photovoltaic solar thermal integration components[J]. Science technology and engineering, 2018, 18(13): 191-199.
[11] 马明瑞, 李明, 吴德众, 等. CPC不同方位辐射量及最佳倾角计算[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(3): 256-262.
MA M R, LI M, WU D Z, et al.Calculation of CPC radiation and optimal inclination in different directions[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2022, 43(3): 256-262.
[12] 常泽辉, 杭小蓉, 刘雪东, 等. 槽式复合多曲面聚光集热器光热性能研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(7): 221-228.
CHANG Z H, HANG X R, LIU X D, et al.Study on photothermal performance of trough compound parabolic concentrator[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2023, 44(7): 221-228.
[13] 胡金萍, 李强. 聚光光斑的均匀性对硅太阳电池性能影响的理论研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2021, 42(10): 23-28.
HU J P, LI Q.Theoretical research of uniformity of light spot influence on performance of concentrating silicon cells[J]. Acta energiae solaris sinica, 2021, 42(10): 23-28.
[14] XUAN Q D, LI G Q, PEI G, et al.Optimization design and performance analysis of a novel asymmetric compound parabolic concentrator with rotation angle for building application[J]. Solar energy, 2017, 158: 808-818.
[15] 易云帆, 郑灿阳, 肖李业, 等. 真空管吸收体非对称复合平面聚光器模型构建与聚能特性[J]. 光学学报, 2024, 44(18): 356-364.
YI Y F, ZHENG C Y, XIAO L Y, et al.Modeling and energy concentration characteristics of asymmetric multi-section compound parabolic concentrator with vacuum tube absorber[J]. Acta optica sinica, 2024, 44(18): 356-364.
[16] RABL A, GOODMAN N B, WINSTON R.Practical design considerations for CPC solar collectors[J]. Solar energy, 1979, 22(4): 373-381.
[17] 谢胡凌, 魏进家, 高阳, 等. 消除复合抛物面聚光器二次反射的设计研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2015, 35(7): 599-604.
XIE H L, WEI J J, GAO Y, et al.A new design method for compound parabolic concentrators by eliminating the secondary reflection[J]. Journal of Chinese society of power engineering, 2015, 35(7): 599-604.
[18] XIE H L, WEI J J, WANG Z X, et al.Design and performance research on eliminating multiple reflections of solar radiation within compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) in hybrid CPV/T system[J]. Solar energy, 2016, 129: 126-146.
[19] BAIG H, SELLAMI N, CHEMISANA D, et al.Performance analysis of a dielectric based 3D building integrated concentrating photovoltaic system[J]. Solar energy, 2014, 103: 525-540.
[20] ZHANG G M, WEI J J, ZHANG L, et al.A comprehensive study on the effects of truncation positions of the compound parabolic concentrator eliminating multiple reflections on the performances of concentrating photovoltaic and thermal system[J]. Applied thermal engineering, 2021, 183: 116162.
PDF(3268 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/