ANALYSIS OF COMBUSTION CHARACTERISTICS AND SLAGGING MECHANISM OF Caragana korshinskii AND Sophora japonica BIOCHAR

Bai Yujia, Li Xinnan, Niu Wenjing, Wang Dongbiao, Zhang Jing, Yang Yuanqing

Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (12) : 452-460.

PDF(4979 KB)
Welcome to visit Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, Today is
PDF(4979 KB)
Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (12) : 452-460. DOI: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2025-1119

ANALYSIS OF COMBUSTION CHARACTERISTICS AND SLAGGING MECHANISM OF Caragana korshinskii AND Sophora japonica BIOCHAR

  • Bai Yujia1,2, Li Xinnan1,2, Niu Wenjing1,2, Wang Dongbiao1,2, Zhang Jing1,2, Yang Yuanqing1,2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Biochars were prepared from Caragana korshinskii and Sophora japonica at pyrolysis temperatures of 240~480 ℃. Their combustion characteristics were evaluated by proximate analysis, ultimate analysis, calorific value determination, and thermogravimetric analysis, while ash composition and slagging rate were analyzed to assess slagging tendency. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction were further employed to characterize the microstructure and mineral phase evolution of the ash. The results showed that the higher heating values of the two feedstocks increased overall after pyrolysis, reaching 27690 kJ/kg for Caragana korshinskii and 23907 kJ/kg for Sophora japonica. Caragana korshinski biochar produced at 400 ℃ exhibited the highest comprehensive combustion characteristic index of 1.864 × 10-8 mg²/(K³·min²), with a maximum combustion rate of 1.70 mg/min, corresponding to 3.02 and 1.98 times that of the raw Caragana, respectively. Its stable combustion index and volatile releasing index were 5.69×10-6 mg/(K²·min) and 2.22×10-4 mg/(K²·min), respectively, both the highest among the tested samples. After high-temperature pyrolysis, the ignition temperature of Sophora japonica biochar increased to 327.9 ℃, 35.9% higher than that of the raw material, while its maximum combustion rate ranged from 1.01 to 1.70 mg/min, with SJ-480 reaching 1.70 mg/min. At air-blowing intensities of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 m/s, the slagging rates of both biochars were below the 9% reference value. The slagging rates of CK~400 were 0.65%~2.21%, while those of SJ-480 were 0.64%~2.41%. After ashing at 550 ℃, the ash of Caragana korshinski biochar pyrolyzed at 400-480 ℃ exhibited SiO₂ and MgSiO₃ phases together with a relatively dense sintered structure, which may affect the migration and aggregation of low-melting-point potassium-bearing species. In contrast, Sophora japonica biochar ash showed different mineral phase compositions and structural evolution characteristics, corresponding to its different slagging response.

Key words

agricultural waste / biochar / pyrolysis temperature / ash / slagging / combustion

Cite this article

Download Citations
Bai Yujia, Li Xinnan, Niu Wenjing, Wang Dongbiao, Zhang Jing, Yang Yuanqing. ANALYSIS OF COMBUSTION CHARACTERISTICS AND SLAGGING MECHANISM OF Caragana korshinskii AND Sophora japonica BIOCHAR[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica. 2026, 47(12): 452-460 https://doi.org/10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2025-1119

References

[1] 国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2025年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[R/OL].2026-02-28.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. Statistical communiqué of the People’s Republic of China on the2025 national economic and social development[R/OL]. 2026-02-28.
[2] Zhang J, He Z, Jin Y. Utilisation of biomass fuel in sintering process[J]. Materials Research Innovations, 2015, 19(sup5): S5-1140-S5-1143.
[3] 田宜水, 王茹. 基于多升温速率法的典型生物质热动力学分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(3): 234-240.
Tian Y S, Wang R.Thermokinetics analysis of biomass based on model-free different heating rate method[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(3): 234-240.
[4] 赵立欣, 贾吉秀, 姚宗路, 等. 生物质连续式分段热解炭化设备研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(8): 221-226, 220.
Zhao L X, Jia J X, Yao Z L, et al.Equipment for biomass continuous grading pyrolysis[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2016, 47(8): 221-226, 220.
[5] 刘正光, 张静. 柠条燃烧特性及燃烧动力学研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2017, 38(9): 2611-2618.
Liu Z G, Zhang J.Study on the combustion characteristics and kinetics of Caragana korshinskii Kom[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2017, 38(9): 2611-2618.
[6] 刘佳政, 牛文娟, 钟菲, 等. 不同类型秸秆生物炭的燃烧特性与动力学分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2019, 40(6): 1647-1655.
Liu J Z, Niu W J, Zhong F, et al.Combustion characteristics and kinetic analysis of different types of crop residue biochars[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2019, 40(6): 1647-1655.
[7] Eddings E G, McAvoy D, Coates R L. Co-firing of pulverized coal with Pinion Pine/Juniper wood in raw, torrefied and pyrolyzed forms[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2017, 161: 273-282.
[8] Gao X P, Wu H W.Biochar as a fuel: 4. emission behavior and characteristics of PM1 and PM10 from the combustion of pulverized biochar in a drop-tube furnace[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2011, 25(6): 2702-2710.
[9] Ramírez V, Martí-Herrero J, Romero M, et al.Energy use of Jatropha oil extraction wastes: Pellets from biochar and Jatropha shell blends[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 215: 1095-1102.
[10] NB/T 34025—2015 生物质固体燃料结渣性试验方法[S].
NB/T 34025—2015 Test method for solid biofuel of clinkering property[S].
[11] Jamil F, Al-Muhtaseb A H, Abu-Jrai A M, et al. Transformation of waste vegetable oil to green fuel in the presence of novel heterogeneous catalysts[J]. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 2025, 27: 101067.
[12] 肖瑞瑞, 陈雪莉, 王辅臣, 等. 不同生物质灰的理化特性[J]. 太阳能学报, 2011, 32(3): 364-369.
Xiao R R, Chen X L, Wang F C, et al.The physicochemical properties of different biomass ash[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2011, 32(3): 364-369.
[13] 喻秋梅, 庞亚军, 陈宏国. 煤燃烧试验中着火点确定方法的探讨[J]. 华北电力技术, 2001(7): 9-10, 50.
Yu Q M, Pang Y J, Chen H G.Determination of ignition points in coal-combustion tests[J]. North China Electric Power, 2001(7): 9-10, 50.
[14] 聂百胜, 白凯丹, 何珩溢, 等. 地下煤层强制燃烧注气流量对含水煤燃烧动力学的影响[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2025, 53(7): 134-145.
Nie B S, Bai K D, He H Y, et al.Effect of gas injection in underground coal combustion on kinetic of water-containing coal[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2025, 53(7): 134-145.
[15] 范泽伟, 桂其林, 李兵, 等. 桉木与煤掺混燃烧实验研究[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 53(1): 92-99.
Fan Z W, Gui Q L, Li B, et al.Experimental study on co-combustion of eucalyptus and coal[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 53(1): 92-99.
[16] 聂其红, 孙绍增, 李争起, 等. 褐煤混煤燃烧特性的热重分析法研究[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2001, 7(1): 72-76.
Nie Q H, Sun S Z, Li Z Q, et al.Thermogravimetric analysis on the combustion characteristics of brown coal blends[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2001, 7(1): 72-76.
[17] 范方宇, 邢献军, 施苏薇, 等. 水热生物炭燃烧特性与动力学分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(15): 219-224.
Fan F Y, Xing X J, Shi S W, et al.Combustion characteristic and kinetics analysis of hydrochars[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(15): 219-224.
[18] 王明峰, 徐建宇, 蒋恩臣, 等. 桉树木屑成型颗粒成分变化和热解特性研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2020, 41(10): 355-360.
Wang M F, Xu J Y, Jiang E C, et al.Study on composition change and pyrolysis properties of eucalyptus sawdust pellets[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2020, 41(10): 355-360.
[19] 蒋绍坚, 王涛, 彭好义, 等. 木质和玉米秸秆成型燃料热重分析与燃烧动力学[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 44(10): 4312-4318.
Jiang S J, Wang T, Peng H Y, et al.Thermogravimetric and combustion dynamics of moulding fuel of woodiness and cornstalk[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2013, 44(10): 4312-4318.
[20] Yang F, Gao P X, Chi L, et al.Enhancement of biochar carbon sequestration through mineral regulation: effects and mechanisms[J]. Agronomy, 2025, 15(4): 943.
[21] GB/T1572—2018 煤的结渣性测定方法[S].
GB/T1572—2018 Determination of clinkering property of coal[S].
PDF(4979 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉